Dave Lindorff
Published: Thursday 9 August 2012
It's not just Romney. Both Obama and Romney are deeply in hock to Corporate America.

US Leadership Increasingly Just Serves Big Corporate Donors

Article image

The Obama re-election campaign and the Democratic Party and their backers, like the organization MoveOn, are bitterly decrying the flood of corporate money going to his opponent, presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney, who is out-fund-raising the president by an ever-increasing amount.

But there is a hollow sound to the president’s whining. Back in 2008, Obama, who had earlier said he opposed corporate funding and had promised to run his campaign using public funds only, in an agreement with his then opponent, Republican Sen. John McCain, broke that agreement and went on to accept what still remains at this point a record sum of corporate money.

By the time the 2008 election was held, Obama’s campaign had collected and spent a staggering $745 million. McCain, who had been a leader in the effort to limit corporate campaign spending, stuck with government funding and thus spent “only” $126 million on his losing general election campaign -- the amount that Obama would have also been limited to had he not “opted out” of his earlier promise to use only government funds to run for the nation’s top office.

About 80% of Obama’s campaign cash came from large donors -- either individuals or, in most cases, corporations. His second biggest donor, giving a total of $1,013,091, was Goldman Sachs, a company that later provided many of the leading economic and financial advisors to the Obama administration, and that, by late 2008, was already known to have been a key player in causing the 2008 financial crisis, and that also received enormous bailout funding from the government, both during the campaign, when Obama was running for office and President George W. Bush was still president, and then later, when Obama was president. The second biggest corporate contributor was software giant Microsoft, $852,167, a company which had serious anti-trust issues being pursued by the federal government. Third was Google, which gave $814,540, which had its own anti-trust and other issues, and fourth was JP Morgan & Chase, another mega-bank that both played a key role in causing the financial crisis, and which benefitted mightily from the federal bailout. Both Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan have subsequently played key roles in lobbying to water down any kind of serious corrective regulation of the financial industry, to block efforts to break up the too-big-to-fail banks, and to have senior banking executives criminally or even civilly prosecuted for their roles in precipitating and profiting from the global economic crisis...



Get Email Alerts from NationofChange
ABOUT Dave Lindorff

Dave Lindorff is an investigative reporter, a columnist for CounterPunch, and a contributor to Businessweek, The Nation, Extra! and Salon.com. He received a Project Censored award in 2004. Dave is also a founding member of the online newspaper ThisCantBeHappening! at www.thiscantbehappening.net

Top Stories

6 comments on "US Leadership Increasingly Just Serves Big Corporate Donors"

Patricia Dixon

August 11, 2012 6:22pm

How sad that this country still calls itself a DEMOCRACY!

It is far from it, but only YOU CAN CHANGE IT by getting involved and demanding campaign reform just as we demanded the end to the Vietnam War.

And while you are at it.......DEMAND AN END TO MILITARY SPENDING!

Btrwy

August 09, 2012 12:23pm

It is pretty obvious both parties are beholden to the big banks and wall street. The middle class is gone thanks to both parties. What is needed is not likely to happen. I suggest everyone (tea baggers get a brain) join the OWS and demand change. If the big banks and wall street were not so damn greedy our middle class could thrive, the nations infrastructure could be up to par, our social safety nets could easily be self supportive and thrive, and there would be enough left that the greedy would still have plenty and no one on their backs. As it is we will have to revolt and likely leave nothing for the greedy bastards.

greghilbert

August 09, 2012 11:35am

Thank you N of C and Dave Lindorf for telling one of the facts that explains Obama's corporatist compromises along the Repub-Dem super-highway to hell.
America was ready for course-change in 2009, and the opportunity was squandered. The great transfer of wealth from the many to the few continues unabated, and now the oligarchs have nearly-complete control no matter who is elected Pres in 2012. I am weary of Dem loyalists telling me things will be worse if Romney is elected, as if that were not obvious. I want to know what THEY are going to do to force change within and/or outside the Dem party.

skingk

August 09, 2012 11:03am

See G. Edward Griffin's video on Youtube: The Quigley Formula

pitch1934

August 09, 2012 10:57am

The only way to stop this crap is with a constitutional amendment prohibiting any private money in politics. All elections, at least Federal ones, should be financed by the government through taxes. You get xxx dollars. That is it. Without corporate financing the opportunity for corruption drops significantly. "What a wonderful world it would be."

Btrwy

August 09, 2012 12:26pm

PITCHman, at least McCain tried with no corporate money. Obviously Obama owed those that donated and it shows. Not that I'll vote for Romney in a million years.