You are viewing the NationofChange archives. For the latest news and actions, visit the new
Get Email Updates | Log In | Register

U.S. Prison Population Seeing “Unprecedented Increase”

Carey L. Biron
Inter Press Service / News Report
Published: Tuesday 5 February 2013
A growing number of these prisoners are being put away for charges related to immigration violations and weapons possession.
Article image

The research wing of the U.S. Congress is warning that three decades of “historically unprecedented” build-up in the number of prisoners incarcerated in the United States have led to a level of overcrowding that is now “taking a toll on the infrastructure” of the federal prison system.

Over the past 30 years, according to a new report by the Congressional Research Service (CRS), the federal prison population has jumped from 25,000 to 219,000 inmates, an increase of nearly 790 percent. Swollen by such figures, for years the United States has incarcerated far more people than any other country, today imprisoning some 716 people out of every 100,000. (Although CRS reports are not made public, a copy can be found here.)

“This is one of the major human rights problems within the United States, as many of the people caught up in the criminal justice system are low income, racial and ethnic minorities, often forgotten by society,” Maria McFarland, deputy director for the U.S. program at Human Rights Watch, told IPS.

In recent years, as a consequence of the imposition of very harsh sentencing policies, McFarland’s office has seen new patterns emerging of juveniles and very elderly people being put in prison.

“Last year, some 95,000 juveniles under 18 years of age were put in prison, and that doesn’t count those in juvenile facilities,” she noted.

“And between 2007 and 2011, the population of those over 64 grew by 94 times the rate of the regular population. Prisons clearly aren’t equipped to take care of these aging people, and you have to question what threat they pose to society – and the justification for imprisoning them.”

According to the new CRS report, a growing number of these prisoners are being put away for charges related to immigration violations and weapons possession. But the largest number is for relatively paltry drug offences – an approach that report author Nathan James, a CRS analyst in crime policy, warns may not be useful in bringing down crime statistics.

“Research suggests that while incarceration did contribute to lower violent crime rates in the 1990s, there are declining marginal returns associated with ever increasing levels of incarceration,” James notes. He suggests that one potential explanation for this could be that people have been increasingly incarcerated for crimes in which there is a “high level of replacement”.

For instance, he says, if a serial rapist is incarcerated, the judicial system has the power to prevent further sexual assaults by that offender, and it is likely that no one will take the offender’s place. “However, if a drug dealer is incarcerated, it is possible that someone will step in to take that person’s place,” James writes. “Therefore, no further crimes may be averted by incarcerating the individual.”

Smarter on crime

Of course, the U.S. prison population’s blooming needs to be traced back to changes within the federal criminal justice system. Recent decades have seen an expanding “get tough” approach on crime here, under which even nonviolent offenders are facing stiff prison sentences.

In turn, overcrowding has become a massive issue, with the federal prison system as a whole operating at 39 percent over capacity in 2011, according to CRS. The result has also been significant price overruns, with the Bureau of Prisons budget doubling to nearly 6.4 billion dollars even while hundreds of millions of dollars worth of unaddressed infrastructure problems continue to mount.

Yet the problems being experienced by the federal prison system actually stand in contrast to certain trends at the state level. While some states have dealt with even more worrisome problems of prison overcrowding – including California, which in 2011 was ordered by the U.S. Supreme Court to take steps to reduce the pressure – recent years have seen movement at the state level to counter over incarceration.

Some of this action may have come from serious state budget crises. Currently, after all, it costs between 25,000 and 30,000 dollars to house a prisoner in the United States.

According to a new report by the Sentencing Project, a Washington advocacy group working on prison reform, prisoner populations in the United States overall declined by around 1.5 percent in 2011. Furthermore, last year lawmakers in 24 states adopted policies that “may contribute to downscaling prison populations”.

“There has been a marked change in the amount of activity at the state level to end our addiction to incarceration,” Vineeta Gupta, deputy legal director with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), told IPS.

“Some states are currently having many discussions they would not have had 10 years ago – getting smarter on crime rather than tougher on crime. None of these moves are comprehensive enough to address the large scope of the problem, but they’re very important starting points.”

She continued: “Unfortunately, the federal government has been going in the opposite direction.”

Mandatory minimum

Arguably, the single most important element in explaining the record incarceration numbers both at the federal and state levels could be “mandatory minimum” sentencing requirements, under which federal and state law over the past two decades has automatically required certain prison sentences for certain crimes, particularly for drug offences.

Such polices have eliminated the ability of judges to tailor judicial responses to individual circumstance. Over the years, sitting judges have resigned over mandatory minimum policies, while others have waged high-visibility campaigns for their rollback.

“Particular attention should be given to reforming mandatory minimums and parole release mechanisms as policies that can work to reduce state prison populations,” the Sentencing Project suggests, noting also that “Mandatory minimums do not reduce crime but result in lengthy prison terms that contribute to overcrowding.”

Such analysis echoes parts of the CRS conclusions while also undergirding growing momentum on the issue. According to the Sentencing Project, seven states last year weakened or repealed certain mandatory minimum regulations.

More dramatically, in mid-January, Senator Patrick Leahy, the head of the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee, told a Washington audience that he would support doing away entirely with federal mandatory minimums, which he called “a great mistake”.

“Senator Leahy’s comments are a very big step towards starting a conversation to address a major driver of the federal growth,” the ACLU’s Gupta says. “The hope is that some of the stuff that’s brewing in the states, where crime in some places is still at an all-time low, can now serve as an example for the federal system.”

This is a terrific article,

This is a terrific article, but neglects to mention the "elephant in the living room."

The for-profit industry (Corrections Corporation of America celebrates three decades of larceny and corruption this year) has contributed substantially to the increase in the numbers of prisoners through direct efforts and contributions to legislators, as well as being the driver of backward immigration policy that has produced billions in profits for its millionaire executives and stockholders.

Letting out 200,000 inmates

Letting out 200,000 inmates to make room for 200,000 bankers gives occupy wall street a whole new perspective.

How much is all of this

How much is all of this costing us? Not just directly, but in the form of creating a huge group of convicted felons who will never be able to hold certain jobs, live in public housing, collect public benefits (including student loans), or....pretty much anything that a person needs to start from nothing in this country. It's hardly surprising that the majority of prisoners end up back in prison after attempting to live on the outside.

If early release and expungement of one's record were offered to prisoners in exchange for completing vocational training or a college degree while in prison, the number who would jump at the chance would almost certainly be very large. These people would leave prison prepared to become taxpaying citizens, instead of being handed the stereotypical bus ticket and new suit that so many receive.

How much can it cost to try it?

The biggest crooks in the US

The biggest crooks in the US are the people who write the laws for the politicians to pass and the politicians who obligingly pass them. The prison system has become a cash cow for them.

The other major offenders are the people who believe that "punishment" is a solution to criminal behavior.

If the US invested in domestic development projects - education, infrastructure, employment, health care, mental health care, etc - instead of pursuing global domination we'd have a healthier, happier population.

Follow the money... More

Follow the money...

More jails, prisons, courtrooms, cops, lawyers, judges, clerks, guards, feeder systems, banksters to "grow" the prison-industrial complex...

All WONDERFUL for the GDP...

Since in USAmerica buying more stuff is becoming less of an option to prop up the Ponzi-Scheme the war and incarceration businesses have to take up the slack...

Doesn't anyone remember Bush

Doesn't anyone remember Bush pushing his 'we need more prisons' agenda? It was about the same time he was telling everyone they deserved a house and that it should be made easier for people to own a house. How'd that turn out?
Hm, now why would he have been pushing for such things? Oh that's right! So his buddies in the mortgage and prison industries could make billions! And those Juveniles? Just getting them conditioned for the big house. Hey, while we're at it, let's put armed guards in schools to better condition those pawns, er, kids into a life of servitude. They must know that armed guards are all around them and only armed guards can keep them safe. Makes for an easy jump to the big house with more armed guards to 'keep them safe' ("And while we're keeping youse safe, maybe youse can make some of these here products for our corporate leaders to sell on the open market. We'll pay you .24 cents an hour!") After all - it's an environment they will have grown accustomed to by the time they graduate high school - if they make it that far.

Comment with your Facebook account

Comment with your Disqus account

Top Stories

comments powered by Disqus

NationofChange works to educate, inform, and fight power with people, corruption with community.

If you would like to stay up to date with the best in independent, filter-free journalism, updates on upcoming events to attend, and more, enter your email below:

7 Compelling Reasons Why You Should Support NationofChange

Our readers often tell us why they’ve decided to step up and become supporters. Here are some of the top reasons people are giving.

1. You’re keeping independent journalism alive
The corporate owned media has proven that it can’t be trusted. In a media landscape wrought with spin and corruption, NationofChange stands in very scarce company.

2. You’re sticking it to the rich, powerful, and corrupt
When you have money in this country you can get away with damn near anything, and they do. NationofChange isn’t afraid to expose these criminals no matter how powerful they are.

3. Your donation is 100% tax-deductible
NationofChange is a 501(c)3 charity. People tend to assume that many other organizations are (most nonprofits are NOT) but it’s that 501(c)3 status is a bit more rare than you think.

Read the rest...