You are viewing the NationofChange archives. For the latest news and actions, visit the new www.NationofChange.org.
Thursday, October 23, 2014 / PROGRESSIVE JOURNALISM FOR POSITIVE ACTION
Get Email Updates | Log In | Register

Terrance Heath
Published: Thursday 23 January 2014
In eight years, Utah has quietly reduced homelessness by 78 percent, and is on track to end homelessness by 2015.

Utah is Ending Homelessness by Giving People Homes

Article image

Earlier this month, Hawaii State representative Tom Bower (D) began walking the streets of his Waikiki district with a sledgehammer, and smashing shopping carts used by homeless people. “Disgusted” by the city’s chronic homelessness problem, Bower decided to take matters into his own hands — literally. He also took to rousing homeless people if he saw them sleeping at bus stops during the day.

Bower’s tactics were over the top, and so unpopular that he quickly declared “Mission accomplished,” and retired his sledgehammer. But Bower’s frustration with his city’s homelessness problem is just an extreme example of the frustration that has led cities to pass measures that effective deal with the homeless by criminalizing homelessness.


 

  • City council members in Columbia, South Carolina, concerned that the city was becoming a “magnet for homeless people,” passed an ordinance giving the homeless the option to either relocate or get arrested. The council later rescinded the ordinance, after backlash from police officers, city workers, and advocates.
  • Last year, Tampa, Florida — which had the most homeless people for a mid-sized city — passed an  ordinance allowing police officers to arrest anyone they saw sleeping in public, or “storing personal property in public.” The city followed up with a ban on panhandling downtown, and other locations around the city.
  • Philadelphia took a somewhat different approach, with a law banning the feeding of homeless people on city parkland. Religious groups objected to the ban, and announced that they would not obey it.
  • Raleigh, North Carolina took the step of asking religious groups to stop their longstanding practice of feeding the homeless in a downtown park on weekends. Religious leaders announced that they would risk arrest rather than stop.

This trend makes Utah’s accomplishment even more noteworthy. In eight years, Utah has quietly reduced homelessness by 78 percent, and is on track to end homelessness by 2015.

How did Utah accomplish this? Simple. Utah solved homelessness by giving people homes. In 2005, Utah figured out that the annual cost of E.R. visits and jail stays for homeless people was about $16,670 per person, compared to $11,000 to provide each homeless person with an apartment and a social worker. So, the state began giving away apartments, with no strings attached. Each participant in Utah’s Housing First program also gets a caseworker to help them become self-sufficient, but they keep the apartment even if they fail. The program has been so successful that other states are hoping to achieve similar results with programs modeled on Utah’s.

It sounds like Utah borrowed a page from Homes Not Handcuffs, the 2009 report by The National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty and The National Coalition for the Homeless. Using a 2004 survey and anecdotal evidence from activists, the report concluded that permanent housing for the homeless is cheaper than criminalization. Housing is not only more human, it’s economical.

This happened in a Republican state! Republicans in Congress would probably have required the homeless to take a drug test before getting an apartment, denied apartments to homeless people with criminal records, and evicted those who failed to become self-sufficient after five years or so. But Utah’s results show that even conservative states can solve problems like homelessness with decidedly progressive solutions.



Quietly for a good reason,

Quietly for a good reason, right?

There is always a solution, but to what extent? It not the sufficiency of the track, as a figure of speech, as the railway budget is enforced by a systematic collapse for humanity, this is insane if, the whole socio-economic isn't altered.

The Venus Project proposes an alternative vision of what the future can be if we apply what we already know in order to achieve a sustainable new world civilization. It calls for a straightforward redesign of our culture in which the age-old inadequacies of war, poverty, hunger, debt and unnecessary human suffering are viewed not only as avoidable, but as totally unacceptable. Anything less will result in a continuation of the same catalogue of problems inherent in today's world. Today many people believe what is needed is a higher sense of ethical standards and the enactment of international laws to assure a sustainable global society.

http://www.thevenusproject.com/

I agree with CAPLOCKS this

I agree with CAPLOCKS this Rep vs Dem stuff by stereotypes is bogus and demeaning. Much of the progressive agenda was begun by Repubs. The shift in logic and the individual attack is very typical for some who dislike and opinion. It wasn't Repubs who opposed integration but Dems. so all of this "I'm a progressive" chest pounding is absurd. I applaud Utah's effort and do not find it out of character for these kind of issues. Just look at the homeless attacks mentioned in the article all in "Progressive" states.

"Just look at the homeless

"Just look at the homeless attacks mentioned in the article all in "Progressive" states" ??? Are you insane? N & S. Carolina and Florida are progressive states?
Maybe by Mississippi or Alabama standards, but certainly not using the definition the rest of the world uses!
Although now that I think of it, if that's where you indeed come from then your claim that Dems opposed integration makes sense.

So what happened to the GOP?

So what happened to the GOP? For the last almost 40 years republican and cold heartless bastard has been first cousin to synonymous.

Someone who use to be

Someone who use to be homeless, shared this link with me. Very interesting solution to a very common problem. I have started a blog where people care: http://4nancigeorge.com/benches-where-angels-sit/. I am not selling anything, and I appreciate your comments, even those I may not agree with.

I DO NOT BELIEVE THIS ARTICLE

I DO NOT BELIEVE THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CHEAPENED IN ITS VALUE BY THE MEASURE OF DEMOCRAT AGAINST REPUBLICAN IN ITS LAST PARAGRAPH...IDIOTIC IS WHAT IT IS!!!I AM A REPUBLICAN AND OVER THE YEARS I HAVE RAISED MANY CHILDREN AND EVEN ADOPTED AS A SINGLE PARENT....STOP BEING STUPID AND TAKING A GREAT ACT OF LOVE AND CHEAPENING IT WITH YOUR IDIOTIC POLITICS...SOCIETY SO MESSED UP THAT WE ARE UNDER A PRESENCE OF SOCIALISM AND YOUR DUMB ENOUGH TO QUIBBLE OVER WEATHER SOMEONE POLITICAL AFFILIATION FITS YOUR MOLD...GROW UP PEOPLE!!!!

You say "STOP BEING STUPID

You say "STOP BEING STUPID AND TAKING A GREAT ACT OF LOVE AND CHEAPENING IT WITH YOUR IDIOTIC POLITICS" then proceed directly to make the following idiotic political statement: "SOCIETY SO MESSED UP THAT WE ARE UNDER A PRESENCE OF SOCIALISM AND YOUR DUMB ENOUGH TO QUIBBLE OVER WEATHER (sic) SOMEONE(s) POLITICAL AFFILIATION FITS YOUR MOLD."
America is "under the presence of socialism"? And you think that belief isn't a product of your own political beliefs entirely (which it surely is)??

Easy, CAPSLOCK.... point

Easy, CAPSLOCK.... point made. I agree with the latter poster in that the article's author was completely fair and impartial, making for an interesting read. Your over-the-top rant merely showed yet another Rottweiler-esqe Republican's redundant overreaction. Feel free to quote me on that, as you go forth spreading the "love" you so obviously have in your heart; the adopting single parent who calls others "STUPID", "IDIOTIC" and "DUMB" as they see fit. And you tell us to grow up? Great advice....now take it.

Considering this "article"

Considering this "article" was actually an OpEd piece, I think the author has the right to "cheapen" his work however he sees fit. Earlier in the piece he also mentioned that the democrats tactics (Bower) were over the top, unpopular and extreme, so he was impartial, and he even compliemented the (conservative) State of Utah in their efforts to combat homelessness. On the contrary, I think the author showed intelligence and maturity!

Comment with your Facebook account



Comment with your Disqus account

Top Stories

comments powered by Disqus

NationofChange works to educate, inform, and fight power with people, corruption with community.

If you would like to stay up to date with the best in independent, filter-free journalism, updates on upcoming events to attend, and more, enter your email below:

7 Compelling Reasons Why You Should Support NationofChange

Our readers often tell us why they’ve decided to step up and become supporters. Here are some of the top reasons people are giving.

1. You’re keeping independent journalism alive
The corporate owned media has proven that it can’t be trusted. In a media landscape wrought with spin and corruption, NationofChange stands in very scarce company.

2. You’re sticking it to the rich, powerful, and corrupt
When you have money in this country you can get away with damn near anything, and they do. NationofChange isn’t afraid to expose these criminals no matter how powerful they are.

3. Your donation is 100% tax-deductible
NationofChange is a 501(c)3 charity. People tend to assume that many other organizations are (most nonprofits are NOT) but it’s that 501(c)3 status is a bit more rare than you think.

Read the rest...