You are viewing the NationofChange archives. For the latest news and actions, visit the new www.NationofChange.org.
Wednesday, November 26, 2014 / PROGRESSIVE JOURNALISM FOR POSITIVE ACTION
Get Email Updates | Log In | Register

Article image
Robert Scheer
Truthdig / Op-Ed
Published: Tuesday 6 November 2012
This election is about picking the lesser of two evils.

Vote for the B-

Article image

It’s crunch time, and I want to be on record, just in case some still undecided independent voter cares what I think. And one might, since I did write a decidedly nonpartisan book on the origins of the economic crisis entitled “The Great American Stickup: How Reagan Republicans and Clinton Democrats Enriched Wall Street While Mugging Main Street.” I have been a harsh critic of Barack Obama for continuing that bipartisan capitulation to Wall Street, but on this and every other matter of serious contention in this election, Mitt Romney is decidedly worse.

A vote for Obama in a swing state is a no-brainer, because, on a host of issues, including immigration, women’s rights, gay rights, health care, campaign finance, income inequality, tax breaks for the rich and the legitimacy of trade unions, there is a vast partisan difference that should not be ignored. It matters greatly who appoints an anticipated two justices to the Supreme Court, which is already dominated by right-wing ideologues.

In a state where a protest vote will not elect Romney, a vote for the Green Party’s admirable Jill Stein, the consistent Libertarian Gary Johnson, or the populist Rocky Anderson sends an appropriate but measured signal of contempt for the sorry state of our two-party system.

That disgust is warranted by the fact that this president has followed the broad ideological outlines of his predecessor on national security. Witness the continuing assault on due process that is the island prison of Guantanamo and the killing of innocent civilians through drone attacks, as well as the unwarranted Nixonian persecution of alleged whistle-blowers Bradley Manning and Julian Assange.

But on all of that, Obama is the lesser evil compared to Romney, who has promised to increase military spending to fight a new Cold War that might, under his stewardship, turn hot against China, Russia, the forlorn Palestinians and anyone else with whom he can pick a fight. Romney is as dangerous as he is inexperienced in such matters. To compensate for his ignorance, he has turned to the same pack of neoconservative ideologues that lied us into Bush’s invasion of Iraq.

On economic policy, Romney has attempted to smear Obama as some kind of big government socialist, although the former vulture capitalist would surely have wasted just as much money as Obama rescuing his friends on Wall Street. Neither candidate would stop the Federal Reserve from continuing to purchase toxic assets to save the banks from their own folly. The candidates split on a bailout of the auto industry, with Obama helping save some decent American jobs, and they disagree about how much the obscenely wealthy should pay in taxes, although sometimes Romney disagrees with himself on that score.

Obama sold out to Wall Street when he appointed Lawrence Summers, who had pocketed more than $8 million in bank and hedge fund fees while serving as a top Obama campaign adviser, to be his key White House expert on the economy. This was an egregious error vastly compounded when he appointed as his Treasury secretary Timothy Geithner, former head of the New York Fed and faithful ally of the Bush administration in filling the lifeboats to capacity with bankers. However, Romney blasts Obama for not being solicitous enough in catering to Wall Street greed and defines the extremely minor reforms of Dodd-Frank as an attack on capitalism, when it is anything but.

As Gretchen Morgenson, the sharpest business journalist of our day, noted in a recent column in The New York Times: “Many Americans probably think the Dodd-Frank financial reform law will protect taxpayers from future bailouts. Wrong. In fact, Dodd-Frank actually widened the federal safety net for big institutions. Under that law, eight more giants were granted the right to tap the Federal Reserve for funding when the crisis hits.”

But Romney finds objectionable even the slightest improvement in transparency and accountability in Dodd-Frank, including a much-needed consumer protection agency championed by Elizabeth Warren. He absolves Wall Street and the Bush administration that let greed run wild of any responsibility for the economic mess and, indeed, seeks to cut funding for programs that aid its victims.

Romney’s talk of the deficit is specious. He would spend multiples of Obama’s stimulus on the military, alone, while relegating the unemployed, disabled and impoverished to the hope of charity and warm weather. Consider the millions of Americans kept fed by Obama’s hard-won extensions of unemployment benefits and food stamps during the worst lows of the recession. How would President Romney have handled such a crisis?

To employ the vernacular used in my day job teaching college students, I give Obama a generous B- grade for initiating a national health care plan that, while flawed, is a start, ending discrimination against gays in the military, easing the student loan crisis, signing equal pay legislation and appointing reasonable Supreme Court justices, among other achievements. Meanwhile, the rapacious capitalist turned candidate Romney—poster boy of the 1 percent—denigrates the less economically fortunate among us while growing filthy rich by slicing and dicing good American jobs out of existence and exploiting every tax loophole to aggrandize his own fortune. He earns a solid F and makes Obama look quite good in comparison.



Author pic
ABOUT Robert Scheer
Robert Scheer, editor in chief of Truthdig, has built a reputation for strong social and political writing over his 30 years as a journalist. His columns appear in newspapers across the country, and his in-depth interviews have made headlines. He conducted the famous Playboy magazine interview in which Jimmy Carter confessed to the lust in his heart and he went on to do many interviews for the Los Angeles Times with Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton and many other prominent political and cultural figures.

Obama never had the support

Obama never had the support to pass his measures into law. Republicans have had control for the last fifty years and it is not getting any better. Thanks for voting democrat , if we can get some support we can turn this mess around. PUT ALL REPUBLICANS ON A RESERVATION TILL THEY AGREE TO PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO OUR CONSTITUTION .

I think your grades are spot

I think your grades are spot on.

Whatever happens in the election, it is the responsibility of EACH OF US to press for a future with full transparency and accountability. Government as well as the private sector is deep in a failure cycle. This has to change, and soon.

JEFF LEWIS, "Government as

JEFF LEWIS, "Government as well as the private sector is deep in a failure cycle." I believe this is why we have seen tepid support for Democrats and President Obama. A helluva lot of voters expected Obama to "punish" the Wall.St. miscreants who brought the house down in '07/'08. Instead, as Scheer points out, he absorbed them into his cabinet and advisory positions.
Private enterprise has had a pulsating vein of corruption since its inception. The average person on the street once looked to government to reign in private industry abuses. Now, many suspect that the "government" is colluding with, or ignoring the very crimes they were elected to protect us from. If every congressperson had a logo, ala NASCAR, embroidered on their apparel, for every "interest" they had received campaign money for, or golf junkets, trips to the Bahamas, etc...and we could watch them on C-Span, then at least we would "know" who had been "purchased" by whom and we'd have a fairly good idea what they wanted in return. I will be voting for Obama after long deliberations with my conscience. Romney/Ryan is simply the face of modern American Fascism. Didn't we fight a war to stop that once?

WOETOPOE: I share a lukewarm

WOETOPOE:

I share a lukewarm response to the President because he kept the Bush-era
secret attacks on constitutional rights and treated Wall St. with kid gloves when so many of its villains deserved jail time. But I do fear a Romney Tea-Party takeover of the federal government, and what it will mean in the coming years, when we have so many challenges in our world. Perhaps I am more forgiving of the President than you, but I think you're making the right choice. Not voting, or throwing away your vote for president, is not going to stop the extremist right-wing plans for repeating the disastrous mistakes of Jr. Bush, or preserve what remains of our "safety net." Actions do have consequences. Too many third-party voters demand perfection in the President, but their actions, or lack of it, are FAR from perfect in addressing our problems.

There are such things as Greater Evil and Lesser Evil, no matter how loudly the uncompromising say there isn't. They either haven't lived long enough to know the difference, or they flunked their history courses. We have to work with what we have, not pine away for a fantasy in Cloudland.

Comment with your Facebook account



Comment with your Disqus account

Top Stories

comments powered by Disqus

NationofChange works to educate, inform, and fight power with people, corruption with community.

If you would like to stay up to date with the best in independent, filter-free journalism, updates on upcoming events to attend, and more, enter your email below:

7 Compelling Reasons Why You Should Support NationofChange

Our readers often tell us why they’ve decided to step up and become supporters. Here are some of the top reasons people are giving.

1. You’re keeping independent journalism alive
The corporate owned media has proven that it can’t be trusted. In a media landscape wrought with spin and corruption, NationofChange stands in very scarce company.

2. You’re sticking it to the rich, powerful, and corrupt
When you have money in this country you can get away with damn near anything, and they do. NationofChange isn’t afraid to expose these criminals no matter how powerful they are.

3. Your donation is 100% tax-deductible
NationofChange is a 501(c)3 charity. People tend to assume that many other organizations are (most nonprofits are NOT) but it’s that 501(c)3 status is a bit more rare than you think.

Read the rest...