You are viewing the NationofChange archives. For the latest news and actions, visit the new
Get Email Updates | Log In | Register

In Wake of Factory Fire, U.S. Labor Groups Attempt Blockade of Walmart Imports

Olivia Rosane
YES! Magazine / News Report
Published: Sunday 23 December 2012
A fire that killed 112 workers in a factory that supplies goods to Walmart has inspired the next wave of actions demanding justice for workers along the company’s supply chain.
Article image

The fight for justice at Walmart went another round on Tuesday morning, as around 75 protesters gathered in Port Newark, N.J., in an attempt to block the unloading of the container ship Maersk Carolina, whose cargo included Walmart-bound goods made in Bangladesh. While the blockade was not successful, the action demonstrated the strengthening alliance between Occupy-related groups and more labor-specific organizations.

The action came less than a month after 112 workers burned to death in the Tazreen Factory in Bangladesh, which supplies clothes to Walmart. Bloomberg reported that in 2011, the retail giant had refused to cover the costs of safety improvements to Bangladeshi factories such as Tazreen. Bangladeshi authorities who researched the case just announced findings of "unpardonable negligence."

The protesters, who included participants in Occupy Wall Street as well as labor and community groups, hoped to connect Walmart’s actions abroad to its actions at home. Goods from Bangladesh are unloaded by the International Longshoreman’s Alliance, then distributed to warehouses, and finally to Walmart’s retail outlets. Labor unrest appears at every stage in this supply chain: the longshoremen are currently in contract negotiations, warehouse workers in California and Illinois went on strike this September over unsafe and unfair working conditions, and retail workers walked out on Black Friday over low wages and retaliatory tactics.

“The main purpose of this event was to highlight Walmart’s abuses throughout the supply chain,” said organizer and Occupy Wall Street member Isham Christie.

Organizers had also planned to disrupt that supply chain. Their original intent was to leaflet the employee entrance to the port and persuade the Longshoremen not to unload the Maersk Carolina.

But port police and Homeland Security agents stepped in and escorted the busses of protesters to a stretch of highway out of sight of the worker entrance. While this outcome disappointed many of those in attendance, it also proved the activists’ point.

“I think they realize the supply chain is vulnerable to economic disruption,” Christie said.

Despite the failure of the blockade, Christie noted that protesters had received many honks of support from passing truckers, and hoped that picketing near the port would give the Longshoremen an edge in contract negotiations. This was the first East Coast port action organized by Occupy Wall Street, Christie said, and it will not be the last.

A deepening alliance

The port action also bore witness to an increasingly fruitful collaboration between Occupy Wall Street and labor and community groups along issues of workers’ rights.

First, individuals within Occupy Wall Street researched the supply route from Bangladesh to the United States and put out the call to action. But that call was taken up by many organizations, including Occupy working groups like 99 Pickets as well as more established labor organizations such as ALIGN, Jobs With Justice, the Retail Action Project, the New Jersey State Industrial Union Council, and the Remember the Triangle Fire Coalition, which sponsored busses from New York City.

Maritza Silva-Farrell, Senior Organizer at ALIGN, has been working to keep Walmart stores out of New York City since 2011. She said the collaboration between Occupy and groups like hers was building momentum around workers’ rights. “We want to build a movement, a real movement, and this is it,” she said.

She praised 99 Pickets, an Occupy working group formed after May Day out of conversations between other labor-related groups such as Immigrant Worker Justice and the Labor Outreach Council. The group works to unite workers and struggles around New York City by organizing, publicizing, and attending picket lines.

Exactly a week before the port action, the two groups helped organize one such action outside a talk on corporate responsibility by Walmart CEO Mike Duke. According to Silva-Farrell, the protest succeeded in influencing some of the questions Duke received at the event.

99 Pickets member Michelle Flores said that worker justice has always been part of Occupy Wall Street’s larger agenda. Many people, she said, had come to OWS from various labor struggles. “Occupy Wall Street built on that momentum and I think that momentum came out of it,” she said.

From the workplace occupation of Hot and Crusty to the Black Friday strikes at Walmart, the fall of 2012 has seen an increased focus on labor militancy within Occupy. Tuesday’s port action, however small, helped build that wave.

As for the Maersk Carolina, its role in the fight for justice at Walmart isn’t over yet. Reports are already emerging that protesters will target the ship again when it docks on Thursday in Charleston, S.C.

Olivia Rosane wrote this article for YES! Magazine, a national, nonprofit media organization that fuses powerful ideas and practical actions. She is a writer and activist living in New York City. In addition to covering Occupy Wall Street for YES! last fall, she has written for Dissent’s blog and The State. Follow her on Twitter @orosane.

I don't believe for one

I don't believe for one minute that the owners of Wal-Mart build more stores solely to create more jobs. They do it to make more profit. Wal-Mart can sell their goods at a lower price because they are so big and can buy in such huge quantities. I find it disturbing that a family as wealthy as the Waltons would not install safety features that might have saved the lives of 112 people. That's just not right.....PERIOD. This argument of "if they don't like working there, they can go somewhere else" misses the point. With all the money that the Wal-Mart family has, why can't they improve the benefits for the people that show up to work at their stores every day to keep them wealthy? It's the old, "Let them eat cake" attitude of the very rich that disgusts me. "We got ours, SCREW the rest of you." I've stopped shopping at Wal-Mart.

So when these unions beat

So when these unions beat Walmart to pay them more money for
Menial level jobs who is going to pay for this exactly? All the people you are
So concerned with will find that food, clothing, and other necessary goods that Walmart keeps priced as low as possible- and you know their prices are lower than most alternative retailers-- will skyrocket higher in cost. This makes the millions of people that depend on Walmart to keep their prices low for their families will pay more- making them poorer for the benefit of a few union members.

If you want to make more money than minimum wage for stocking cans on shelves than work hard and get promoted. Walmart takes their profits and opens more stores- creating more jobs and lower cost goods to more people with less cost of driving. Who shops at Walmart the 1% people?

If these union members feel abused and under by Walmart-- quit! And go work for a company that will pay you what you think you are worth or better start your own business where your worth is defined completely by your success alone.

Don't expect a job that takes an hour of training to pay you enough to support a wife, three kids and two cars and a jet ski- unless you work for the government of course and then you hardly even have to work at all!

Comment with your Facebook account

Comment with your Disqus account

Top Stories

comments powered by Disqus

NationofChange works to educate, inform, and fight power with people, corruption with community.

If you would like to stay up to date with the best in independent, filter-free journalism, updates on upcoming events to attend, and more, enter your email below:

7 Compelling Reasons Why You Should Support NationofChange

Our readers often tell us why they’ve decided to step up and become supporters. Here are some of the top reasons people are giving.

1. You’re keeping independent journalism alive
The corporate owned media has proven that it can’t be trusted. In a media landscape wrought with spin and corruption, NationofChange stands in very scarce company.

2. You’re sticking it to the rich, powerful, and corrupt
When you have money in this country you can get away with damn near anything, and they do. NationofChange isn’t afraid to expose these criminals no matter how powerful they are.

3. Your donation is 100% tax-deductible
NationofChange is a 501(c)3 charity. People tend to assume that many other organizations are (most nonprofits are NOT) but it’s that 501(c)3 status is a bit more rare than you think.

Read the rest...