What We Still Don’t Know About Mitt Romney’s Taxes
With the documents Mitt Romney released recently, we know a bit more about his taxes.
We know, for instance, that Romney paid a rate of 14.1 percent on $13.7 million in income on his 2011 tax return, which he achieved by purposely overpaying. Though he was entitled to deduct $4 million in charitable contributions, Romney deducted only $2.25 million to keep his tax rate above 13 percent.
(Romney, it has been pointed out, could file an amended return to claim the full deduction after the election. We've contacted the Romney campaign, and Michele Davis, a spokeswoman, assured us he would not do so.)
We know, according to a letter from his accountants at Price water house Coopers, that Romney has paid state and federal income taxes each year since at least 1990, which would seem to disprove Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid’s claim in July that Romney had not paid any taxes for a decade.
And we know that Romney’s tax rate since 1990 never dipped below 13.66 percent, according to his accountants. Romney paid an average effective tax rate between 1990 and 2009 of 20.2 percent.
But there’s still a lot we don’t know. “I think most of the major questions we had before [last Friday] are still out there,” said Brian Galle, a tax law professor at Boston College. Here are a few:
How much did Romney make before 2010?
While Romney has disclosed his average effective tax rate for the last two decades, he hasn’t said how much he earned in those years or how much — the dollar amount — he paid in taxes.
That’s an important distinction, said Daniel Shaviro, a tax law professor at New York University. Various tax-planning strategies may have enabled Romney to reduce his adjusted gross income in some years.
In 2008, for instance, investors everywhere lost money when the stock market tanked. Romney may have carried those losses forward, Shaviro said, and used them to reduce his adjusted gross income in 2009. While we know Romney paid at least 13.66 percent of the income he recorded on his taxes in a given year, we don’t know what percentage he paid of the money actually took home that year.
Why is Romney’s IRA worth so much?
Much of Romney’s wealth sits in his IRA, which is worth as much as $101.6 million. It’s a remarkable number, in part because Romney would have been able to contribute a maximum of $30,000 a year to his IRA while he was at Bain, from 1984 to 1999.
Galle, the Boston College tax law professor, said the most likely explanation for the outsized IRA is that Romney put in shares in Bain investments that swelled in value. According to the Wall Street Journal, Bain allowed employees to buy a special class of shares in the firm’s investments. The shares didn’t cost very much, but they could be extremely lucrative. In one deal, the Journal reported, “some Bain employees saw a 583-fold increase” in the value of their shares — an astronomical return. Because the shares were in IRAs, the profits could be plowed into new Bain deals without subtracting taxes.
Romney also may have beefed up his IRA by contributing “carried interest” — a share of the profits in funds managed by Bain. As Reuters reported earlier this year, any potential carried interest would “not be disclosed in his personal financial summary or on a federal income tax return.” In other words, even if Romney released all his tax returns, we still might not know exactly how he accumulated his huge IRA.
What about Romney’s investments offshore?
We know many of Romney’s IRA investments are based in foreign countries but it’s hard to know how much. He valued one account in the Cayman Islands at anywhere between $5 million and $25 million.
One thing we do know is that Romney pays a far lower tax rate overseas than he does here. According to Quartz, Romney paid only 2.4 percent in foreign taxes in 2011 on the $3.5 million he earned abroad.
We also know where Romney’s current overseas investments are held —Bermuda, the Cayman Islands, Switzerland, Luxembourg — and many of the firms he has invested in, including a state-owned Chinese oil company and a Chinese bank that Romney’s family trusts sold their stake in last year. But we don’t have a lot of other important documentation, including forms would show whether Romney had, as the New York Times has reported, “over the years declared all of his foreign income to the IRS in a timely manner.”
The Wall Street Journal has reported that Romney’s offshore IRA investments likely helped him avoid a little-known tax called the unrelated business income tax. The tax, “meant to discourage tax-exempt entities such as an IRA or college endowment fund from unfairly competing with for-profit, taxpaying entities by operating a business without paying taxes on it,” could have hit Romney at up to 35 percent.
The Romney campaign seems unlikely to release any more information about his finances, but that hasn’t kept reporters from digging it up. Bloomberg, for instance, analyzed securities filings to report last Thursday that Romney has set up a type of trust known as an “I Dig It” trust — a legal way for Romney to avoid estate and gift taxes and pass some of his fortune onto future generations.
CONNECT













5 comments on "What We Still Don’t Know About Mitt Romney’s Taxes"
October 03, 2012 3:58pm
This discussion matters only to people with low incomes who are overly suspicious or jealous of people with high incomes. The income of a rich person usually has less effect on the income of a poor person than a poor person's decision not to seek training or education that would qualify him/her for a better job. High incomes don't suck up all the money in the system. They are earned by people who are productive enough to offer greater value to an employer or entrepreneurs who invent more efficient processes.
My opinion comes from decades of observing people of all ages who "hate math" (and education in general) and wind up losing jobs as laborers (which they call "honest, hard work" in a kind of reverse snobbery) to machines that don't earn wages or get sick. The business world never was a charity, and government should try to avoid being a patsy. There is some truth to "some people are homeless because they want to be" (i.e., want to avoid the responsibility).
October 01, 2012 9:38pm
China, huh? I wonder how tough he'll be on China considering he's investing there.
October 01, 2012 8:06pm
Whatever we learn or not about Mitt Romney's actual wealth and taxes is eclipsed by what these matters have taught us about his character. His father apparently was the presidential candidate who began the custom and set the civic ethics standard wherein candidates unconditionally disclose the last dozen years of income tax returns. Mitt Romney has chosen deliberately to violate a standard of civic ethics set by his own father.
No matter how many PWC statements and other press-agentry and calculations we get about Mitt's taxes, that is the telling fact that remains: the man disowns the ethical example and standard of his own father.
Mr Obama, through his hand-wringing inaction against mass murder in Sudan and Syria - has demonstrated himself a moral failure. Now, albeit in a quite different way, so too has Mr Romney.
October 01, 2012 10:39am
We do know that in 2010 Mr. Romney showed a Loss Carryover from previous years as a deduction on 2010 earnings. That means that he incurred more losses in prior years than he could use so they were carried forward. That would totally shield all earnings from investments for those years. However, if that were the extent of the story, he would have released the returns. The real unknown has to do with a legal matter concerning off-shore investments. As explained by Lawrence O'Donnell, many of his fellow rich guy off-shore investors found themselves in trouble with Uncle Sam (IRS) and made a deal to avoid federal prosecution for a felony. If Gov. Romney was one of those involved in the deal, he would need to do whatever is necessary to prevent that disclosure. It would, if disclosed, be the end of any campaign for public office. We don't know if there is any validity to the claim by Mr. O'Donnell, but by refusing to release the returns Mr. Romney leaves the suspicions unresolved.
October 01, 2012 12:44pm
Indeed. The IRS program was called the Offshore Voluntary Disclosure Program. The IRS figured it would get more revenue by allowing scofflaws to voluntarily pay back taxes owed (plus a penalty) rather than trying to take individuals to court. An interesting aspect of this IRS program was that participants would not be publicly disclosed! And, if Romney paid a penalty in 2010 on taxes owed, maybe that helped keep his "effective tax rate" above 13%!