Article image
Robert Reich
NationofChange / Op-Ed
Published: Wednesday 25 April 2012
“For the record, I’m not a communist and I don’t secretly adore Karl Marx.”

Why Anyone Should Care that Bill O’Reilly Calls Me a Communist

Article image

Bill O’Reilly, the tumescent personality of Fox News, said on his Friday show “Robert Reich is a communist who secretly adores Karl Marx.” (This came after Fox News’ Neil Cavoto called me a “sanctimonious twit” for suggesting the rich should pay more in taxes.)

O’Reilly’s accusation is odd, to say the least. If we were living in the 1950s, amid Senator Joe McCarthy’s communist witch-hunts, the claim might have some bite and cause me injury. But these days it’s hard to find a full-throated communist anywhere in the world.

O’Reilly’s accusation isn’t even logical. How can he know if I secretly adore Karl Marx, if it’s a secret?

For the record, I’m not a communist and I don’t secretly adore Karl Marx.

Ordinarily I don’t bother repeating anything Bill O’Reilly says. But this particular whopper is significant because it represents what O’Reilly and Fox News, among others, are doing to the national dialogue.

They’re burying it in doo-doo.

O’Reilly based his claim on an interview I did last week with Jon Stewart on the Daily Show, in which I argued that because America’s big corporations were now global we could no longer rely on them to make necessary investments in human capital or to lobby for public investments in education, infrastructure, and basic R&D. So, logically, government has to step in.

Since when does an argument for public investment in education, infrastructure, and basic R&D make someone a communist or a secret adorer of Karl Marx?

Obviously, O’Reilly has no interest in arguing anything. Ad hominem attacks are always the last refuges of intellectual boors lacking any logic or argument. (Whoops, I think I just stooped to name-calling. Sorry, Bill.)

Yet this is what’s happening to all debate all over America: It’s disappearing. All we’re left with is a nasty residue.

In Washington, Democrats and Republicans no longer even talk. They just vent charges and counter-charges.

The 2012 election doesn’t seem likely to clarify any issue. At this moment the candidates and their surrogates are debating the treatment of dogs.

Across the nation, conservatives right-wingers and liberal or progressive lefties have stopped debating their respective views, or even listening to anyone they disagree with. They just find broadcasters and bloggers who confirm their views.

We’re even sorting by belief according to where we live. Today your neighbors are more likely to agree with your politics than disagree. We’ve settled into like-minded enclaves where we don’t need to think because everyone we meet confirms what we assume we already know.

It’s not that the nation is more polarized than it’s been in the past. America has been through searing conflicts, some within the living memories of most of us. The communist witch-hunts of the 1950s were followed by the civil rights movement, the Vietnam War, battles over womens’ reproductive rights and gay marriage.

What makes America’s current polarization remarkable isn’t the severity of our disagreements but our utter lack of engagement debating them.

So many Americans are so angry and frustrated these days – vulnerable to loss of job and healthcare and home, without a shred of economic security – they’re easy prey for demagogues offering simple answers and ready scapegoats. Take, for example, Bill O’Reilly and his colleagues at Fox News.

But people can only learn from others who disagree with them — or at least from witnessing debates between people who respectfully and civilly disagree. Without respect and civility, it’s not a debate – it’s just name-calling.

A democracy depends on public deliberation and debate. Without it, the members of a society have no means of understanding what they believe or why. The Lincoln-Douglas debates were notable not because they solved anything but because they helped Americans clarify where they agreed and disagreed on the wrenching issue of slavery.

Hence the danger today – when deliberation has stopped.

This morning I left a message on Bill O’Reilly’s office phone asking him to invite me onto his show to debate whether public investments in education and infrastructure are needed.

What are the odds he’ll invite me on?

Get #BeyondOutrage.

This article was originally posted on Robert Reich's blog.



Get Email Alerts from NationofChange
Author pic
ABOUT Robert Reich

 

ROBERT B. REICH, one of the nation’s leading experts on work and the economy, is Chancellor’s Professor of Public Policy at the Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. Time Magazine has named him one of the ten most effective cabinet secretaries of the last century. He has written thirteen books, including his latest best-seller, “Aftershock: The Next Economy and America’s Future;” “The Work of Nations,” which has been translated into 22 languages; and his newest, an e-book, “Beyond Outrage.” His syndicated columns, television appearances, and public radio commentaries reach millions of people each week. He is also a founding editor of the American Prospect magazine, and Chairman of the citizen’s group Common Cause. His widely-read blog can be found at www.robertreich.org.

Top Stories

48 comments on "Why Anyone Should Care that Bill O’Reilly Calls Me a Communist"

G.E.R.R.Y.

April 27, 2012 3:24pm

Mr. Reich, if you read these comments in NofC, or any other kind reader, would you please send me that video interview? For some unknown reason, The Comedy Network, the NationofChange, and every other site I tried said that the video was unavailable in my location. Why is Canada denied access to these videos?

I can be reached at

Tosh

April 26, 2012 6:48pm

Thanks to The Daily Show et
al., I get to laugh at O'really.

This tumescent , (apt description Dr. Reich), anal sphincter has no clue that the moon controls the ebb and flow of tides. How can any thinking person listen to his tripe?

autana

April 26, 2012 5:08pm

Take it from someone who worked in advertising for years: The Right is not interested in dialogue, they are interested in incendiary opportunities to get themselves on air at hyperbole enhanced emotional moments. And every time anyone of decency responds to their absurd claims provides priceless opportunity to deliver their venom. And as insane as their arguments might seem, they are effective in delivery, because they target folk that are not like you and I and their venom does not travel through arteries of logic. It travels through subconscious channels that aim directly at the limbic brain;
Us v. Them. Black &White perception, Fear-Induced instinctual response. Oblivion is the best weapon we have at our disposal and, ordinarily Limbaugh deserves no reply. HOWEVER, Professor Reich's decision to point his sights at Limbaugh is brilliant: His arguments can now ride Limbaugh's extraordinary ratings into a massive conservative audience and deliver his message to a "forum" that normally sees no commonsense. Our times are tricky; they require savvy Machiavellian strategy, and Professor Reich is clearly no weenie!!

autana

April 26, 2012 4:39pm

We are caught between a Neo-Fascist American movement and a mass-communication challenged Democratic establishment that can't sell the greatest things our political system can offer: justice, sustainable development, long-term investment in a nation that is great precisely because of all the great long-term investment we benefit from.

Calling Reich a communist is nothing more than right-wing pamphleteering. Turning dialogue into absolutist confrontation and destroying everything that democracy is about. But we know who these guys are! How they have now for decades repeated lies that even progressives now repeat. What we need is counter propaganda; effective, direct, simple mass-communication that delivers contemporary equivalents of "We have nothing to fear but fear itself". Ten years ago we could blame "them", today we can only blame our own movements lack of communicational projection. In Politics perception is everything, and perception is what we progressives are terrible at! There is a saying in South America that I learned when I lived there that says it all: "Guerra avisada no mata soldado" A war announced in advance kills no soldier. Bill Clinton was justified to complain about the then "new" right-wing conspiracy, we are not.

teabagged2Death

April 26, 2012 9:08am

Too many replies to mention everyone, but it is obvious which ones are not able to read and comprehend.

For BOZOADULT: "I say, that's a joke, son!" It's called Satire, ala Stan Freburg, Mort Sahl, Harry Shearer & the Credibility Gap, Tony Hendra & NatLamp, et.al. Now take off that Clown Suit because you don't deserve to wear it!

For ALLENLEVY: The last time I watched the Daily Show, Craig Kilborn was the host. Please don't generalize about jokesters being politically inactive and/or inept. My activism goes back to 1970, as a petioner, letter writer, registering voters, etc. - we stopped an unconstitutional, illegal, immoral war with one phrase "Make Love, Not War" - and that's No Joke. Please join me in my decades-long letter writing campaign with CC to every member of Congress, for election reform so that we may start up an American Labor Party.

For ATLASR: Please get your facts straight. That's an obvious Foxist and/or Libertarian response, but what little pay educators actually recieve, the professor is at UC Berkeley, not Harvard. Someone wiser than I am, Mr. Thom Hartmann, said "A libertarian is just a Republican who wants to smoke pot and get laid." Atlas shrugged, then bullied and bought his way to the top. That is not Darwinism, merely predatory greed. Ayn Rand is a boor.

On the other hand, for THEODOREZIOKOWSKI: Don't bother sending your common sense tax reform to O'Reilly. He can't read an entire paragraph, and the mere mention of Thomas Paine will spark a frenzied anti-foreigner barrage ending with "so, why didn't you just stay in Scotland, Mr. Paine?"

For all of those who did or will continue to reply without reading and comprehending one single comment, article or background information thereof, please heed the words of our great American philosopher, Moses Horwitz: "Pipe down, Numbskull. Those of us who can are tryin' to think!"

Six

April 26, 2012 7:24am

Study; www.marxists.org
Hellen Keller was a Socialist and derided for it. Did you learn about that in school?
Why DEFEND yourself unless like them you are laboring under misconceptions about Marx or Communism? You have handed them the power or you are afraid of them.
Here! Here! Teabaggedtodeath ; 'everyone who reads it becomes an instant Marxist.'
Stand up Reich come out of the closet and stop cowing or stop trying to back bad policy look reasonable.
First they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.

Then they came for me
and there was no one left to speak out for me.

Six

April 26, 2012 7:13am

When I was just a little thing
I used to love parades.
With banners, bands, red balloons,
and maybe lemonade.
When I came home one May Day,
my neighbour’s father said,
“Them marchers is all commies.
Tell me kid, are you a Red?”

Well I didn’t know just what he meant-
my hair back then was brown.
Our house was plain red brick-
like most others in the town.
So I went and asked my momma
why our neighbour called me red.
My mummy took me on her knee
and this is what she said,

“Well ya ain’t done nothing
if ya ain’t been called a Red.
If you marched or agitated,
then you’re bound to hear it said.
So you might as well ignore it
or love the word instead.
Cuz ya ain’t been doing nothing
if ya ain’t been called a Red.”

When I was growing up,
had my troubles I suppose.
When someone took exception
to my face or to my clothes.
Or tried to cheat me on the job
or hit me on the head.
When I organized to fight back,
why the stinkers called me Red

But ya ain’t done nothing
if ya ain’t been called a Red
if you marched or agitated,
then you’re bound to hear it said.
So you might as well ignore it
or love the word instead.
Cuz ya ain’t been doing nothing
if ya ain’t been called a Red.

When I was living on my own,
one apartment that I had.
Had a lousy rotten landlord
Let me tell you he was bad.
But when he tried to throw me out,
I rubbed my hands and said,
“You haven’t seen a struggle
if you haven’t fought a Red!”

And ya ain’t done nothing
if ya ain’t been called a Red.
If you marched or agitated,
then you’re bound to hear it said.
So you might as well ignore it
or love the word instead.
Cuz ya ain’t been doing nothing
if ya ain’t been called a Red.

Atlasr

April 25, 2012 6:05pm

You said years sho on tv --" as we all know corporations exist for the benefit of their employees".

I have used that for years as the best one sentence description of The Communist credo ever spoken.

Only a Communist would say such an absurd statement and make it sound as accepted universally by rational people.

This is the twist speak used by all Communists since Marx wrote down his fantasy ecOnomic theories.

You are livid that your cover has been seen through finally. This makes two of us out here that don't believe corporations exist for their employees- they are created by their shareholders with the goal of making a profit by supplying products and services that people freely trade their cash for to acquire.

At least in Europe Communists proudly proclaim their beliefs - here in America you hide under Progressive- and try to make Commumist and even socialist a phrase used by mentally deranged right wingers-- villify the words so you can't be exposed. Eventually you will add the word "I" to the list of banned words.

Also " spreading the wealth around" was fairly good as well- short concise definition of Communism -- who was that Communist that uttered those words?

Be a man -stand up and proudly proclaim yourself a card carrying Communist already-- okay- stand on a box if you have to already- but try having some integrity and stop calling yourself a capitalist already.

Lightning Joe

April 29, 2012 12:13pm

What a crock, Atlas! This is a great one: "Have the "integrity" to admit you are what I said you are -- even if you're not."

1) bring an accusation based on nothing but what some blowhard says.

2) deny it.

3) be called out by AtlasR.

Why did #3 happen? Because with two data points to go on, Atlas prefers the hateful one. That's it. Any other "information" Atlas brings to his "judgement" is ALSO gleaned from the SAME SOURCE the accusation was gotten from.

So much, for the presumption of no guilt. If O'Rielly accuses you of something, no matter how unfounded, why that MEANS you are guilty, doesn't it?

Atlas, you can by-God believe what you want to, but don't expect anyone else to follow you down that rabbit hole, because WE can tell where it leads.

Tosh

April 26, 2012 6:39pm

Robert Reich for Chairman of The Federal Reserve, or Secretary of the Treasury!!!!

Tosh

April 26, 2012 6:27pm

STFU. You are a card-carrying troll, with no idea of facts to back up your feces.

Pierre Stone

April 25, 2012 4:43pm

As far as I know, if someone is a communist, it is no secret to anyone who knows what a communist is, that that person has at least an appreciation of Karl Marx's teachings.

Even so, Reich decides to entertain O’Reilly's patently nonsensical claim. He does so because that brand of excremental talk is destroying "the national dialogue." I was surprised to learn that there was such a thing as a national dialogue.

DonsDomain

April 25, 2012 4:41pm

Thank you, Prof. Reich, for your service and continued writing. The sad news re this good article is that it will probably not change any votes. By the looks of it, the conservative readers here are not necesarily the brightest of the bunch, and fit nicely into the 'Yell Now Think Later' faction.

We as Americans do not become better unless e talk to those with whom we disagree. Just as we must make peace with our enemies in international issues, democracy is compromise and like a bonzai plant, it is never finished, always a work in progress.

I do appreciate the readers who try to ad to better understanding and furthuring a dialogue.

Tosh

April 26, 2012 6:23pm

Well said. There should be a thumbs-up button on this thread.

TFWelsh

April 25, 2012 3:54pm

Oldhat,a 12-year-old poll, and no further attribution? Seriously...

wildthang

April 25, 2012 3:47pm

I seriously doubt that once our elite democracy for lndowners gave way to full voting that discussion was much more than appeal to hysteria. Today, however, there is so few ways to make money, it has become an excellent and easy way to accumulate lots of income for those who aren't already rich. How much intelligent coverage was there of Jackson ignoring of the Supreme Court to go ahead and move the Cherokees to Oklahoma I wonder? There has never been a war that has been free of hysterical propaganda including the revolutionary war.
It indicates that the votes don't make too much difference except to the patronage system that is getting chosen.
The multi-national corporations for which we are fighting wars are a world order without borders and they do not have any country allegiance at all. Neither do their major stockholders for the corporate purposes of earning them top investment dollars. That would also includes giant institutional investors of all kinds no matter what country. Given all the oil money invested we know where lots of the investors currently reside.Actually nationality and borders may disappear completely and everything will be provided by corporations on a worldwide network basis.

oldhat

April 25, 2012 3:08pm

no reich is not a total marxist [about 92%] yes i have read marx and studied influences on him

Lightning Joe

April 29, 2012 12:17pm

Well, Oldhat, I'd say that someone who has actually (gasp!) STUDIED Marx would be a much better candidate for being accused of Marxism (I, for instance, have not), than someone who just happens to see a bit of the same sense Marx saw.

Tosh

April 26, 2012 6:19pm

So, what's wrong with Marx? Great ideas if enacted to the letter of his writings!

"America’s big corporations were now global we could no longer rely on them to make necessary investments in human capital "
WRONG!, READ:
The Benefits USA 2010/2011 survey results found 84.7 percent of companies
offer tuition reimbursement to their employees.

"or to lobby for public investments in education" (AS IN DON'T INVEST)
WRONG!, READ:
Only seven of this year's companies, 2%, do nothing for education, down from 4% in 1989. Though 41% of the companies that participated in the 1990 poll give less than $100,000 annually to public schools, 28% donate from $100,000 to $500,000, and a laudable 18% contribute $1 million or more a year.

"and basic R&D" (AS IN NOT DOING IT)
WRONG!, READ:
R&D Spending Growth Continues
While Globalization Accelerates
Global R&D spending will increase in 2012 with continued strong growth in emerging economies and stable growth in established economies.

YOU NEED TO GET OUT MORE MR. REICH!! EVERYTHING IN YOUR BASIC PREMISE FOR THIS ARTICLE IS WRONG.

enuf

April 25, 2012 5:48pm

Anonymous poster with "facts" and no link to their source. Little credibility

Tosh

April 26, 2012 6:16pm

A "cut and paster". You're right ENUF.

Riconui

April 25, 2012 1:10pm

Why should anyone pay attention to anything Bill O says. Whoever he may be when he's not in his studio, he is a corporate product when the cameras are on. His product is bombast and insult and ad hominems and contribute exactly nothing to our national discourse. He shows up, he puts on make up, he spews his patented brand of inanities, mostly extracted directly from his ass, for an audience that is intellectually equipped to digest little else, he collects a paycheck. His may be the easiest and least justifiable job in America. He clearly knows squat about Marx, even by the low standards (and I hesitate to even use the term) of fox "news"he is hardly qualified to speak on what another human being "secretly" believes. He's barely qualified to speak on what HE believes since it's clear that he is a bought and paid for shill.

Mr Reich, there is much that I would take issue with you on, there is perhaps more that I might find I agree with you on, but I rarely miss the opportunity to read your missives and always come away feeling I got something. Don't waste your time with BillO. He's a vacuous ass who happens to be on television. So what?

belleville

April 25, 2012 1:01pm

We don't need to go back to Eisenhower's tax rates of 91% as a top marginal rate. We need to think about 1938 Tax Code of 33 tax brackets, in order to cover all classes of income. These 33 tax brackets ranged from 4% for all income up to $64,000.(adjusted for inflation), all the way up to a top marginal rate of 79% for income over $79,Million. Robert Reich is a fair and honest man, who isn't out for himself. He puts country first. Most people on TV earn over $600,000/yr, and some way over $1,000,000./yr, so most of them don't want to bring up the subject of raising taxes on the rich and super rich. Bill O'Reilly is one such rich man, and resorts to name calling to get his followers to follow his twisted logic. Most of his followers don't know the definition of Communism, or who Karl Marx was. If Bill said he was a bad guy, that's good enough for them. With all the things wrong with this country, very few people understand that we could solve 98% of the country's problems simply by rewriting the Tax Code to 20 or 30 Tax Brackets, and a top marginal rate of 55% or 60%. I would love our 99% people to get behind a major movement of "20 Brackets to $20,Million".

Andrea Jonesburg

April 25, 2012 1:01pm

I find it strange the Karl Marx is still considered the bogey man, even though, what he predicted, which is that capitalism is flawed, is perfectly correct. Not only that, most capitalists study him and understand that his analysis is very correct. Also, it is increasing apparent that the bankers, investors, and the success of the Market completely dominates governmental policy around the world. All the bailouts, both here in the US and in Europe, are bailouts for the banks while the welfare of the people is ignored. So, if you are not a Marxist at this stage in history, you have your head in the sand.

Lightning Joe

April 29, 2012 12:25pm

Accurate.

For someone's writings to still command enough respect to incite the ire of his targets in this day and age, means that he had something going for his argument. Insults that do not, or no longer apply, do not persist in the dialog.

Marx WAS right that Capitalism is deeply anti-people. It makes a very few people very very Rich, and corrupts the politics of WHATEVER system is in effect, in order to nail down that advantage.

Now note that I DID NOT SAY that what we know as "Communism" is any better at all. In fact, what we know as Communism, while IDEOLOGICALLY more appealing, still needs to be administered by PEOPLE -- who can be just as corrupt wielding power as any Top Carnivore Capitalist.

Joan Moore

April 25, 2012 12:54pm

I am reminded of a great old folk song we used to sing at the Great Labor Song Exchange called: "You ain't be doin' nothin' if you ain't been called a Red.." I wish I could remember all the verses, but the title really says it all. Consider it a compliment, Bob....especially from a dingbat like O'Reilly.

Theodore Ziolkowski

April 25, 2012 12:46pm

Income Tax Reform.

Will Rogers said: “The difference between Death and Taxes is Death doesn't get worse every time Congress meets.”

Thomas Paine urged that everything "beyond what a man's own hands produce" was a gift that came to him simply by living in society, and hence, "he owes on every principle of justice, of gratitude, and of civilization, a part of that accumulation back again to society from whence the whole came."

First I will say that any Income Tax Reform that continue to allow for Exceptions, Exemptions and Deduction will never be Fair and Equal to all. To many loopholes will exist through which the 1.0% of the Rich and Powerful Individuals and Corporations, Companies, Institutions and Organizations squeeze through and pay NO TAXES. Even if we made the INCOME TAX RATE on every individual who made over one million dollars be 99%, with the use of the Exceptions, Exemptions and Deductions they could not pay any taxes.

The Entire Income Tax Code MUST be Repealed and Replaced. By the elimination of ALL the EXCEPTIONS, EXEMPTIONS, and DEDUCTIONS and by making every source of Income [Wages, Bonuses, Benefits, Interest Earnings, Capital Gains, and any other earnings or Gains] be subject to the same Tax Code and Rate no matter How it was earned, Where it was earned, or What it was earned from.

If Congress wants to provide an incentive to Corporations, Companies, Institutions or Organizations, Congress can do so by creating a Tax Credit with specified amounts and time limits.

HERE is an Income Tax Code that is based upon Fairness and Equality, and the ability to pay, Just like everything else in life. PLEASE note that the implementation of this Tax Code would significantly reduce the size of the IRS, reduce the amount of time to prepare your Taxes, and sorry to say it, but it gets rid of the need for Tax Preparation Companies.

The official numbers don’t tell the full story. The situation of the poor is actually considerably worse than the Government reports. The official poverty line is calculated as simply three times the minimal food budget first introduced in 1959, and then adjusted for inflation in food costs. In other words, the American poverty threshold takes no account of the cost of housing or fuel or transportation or health-care costs, all of which are rising more rapidly than the cost of basic foods. So the poverty measure grossly understates the real cost of subsistence.

My proposed Poverty Income Levels and the Taxes:
[1.0] Income earned from $.01 to $13,537.00 for a family of one would pay Zero Tax Rate.
[2.0] Income earned from $.01 to $23,689.00 for a family of two would be Zero Tax Rate.
[3.0] Income earned from $.01 to $30,478.00 for a family of three would be Zero Tax Rate.
[4.0] Income earned from $.01 to $37,267.00 for a family of four would be Zero Tax Rate.
[5.0] Income earned from $.01 to $44,056.00 for a family of five would be Zero Tax Rate.
[6.0] Income earned from $.01 to $50,845.00 for a family of six would be Zero Tax Rate.
[7.0] Income earned from $.01 to $57,634.00 for a family of seven would be Zero Tax Rate.
[8.0] Income earned from $.01 to $64,423.00 for a family of eight would be Zero Tax rate.

For those who are not in the Poverty Income Level the Tax Rates would be as follows:

[9.0] Income earned from $13,537.00 to $100,000.00 would pay a 15.0% Tax Rate. PLUS.

[10.0] Income earned from $100,000.01 to $500,000.00 would pay 17.5% Tax Rate. PLUS.

[11.0] Income earned from $500,000.01 to $1,000,000.00 would pay 20.0%Tax Rate. PLUS.

[12.0] Income earned from $1,000,000.01 to $50,000,000.00 would pay 25.0% Tax Rate. PLUS.

[13.0] Income earned from $50,000,000.01 to $1,000,000,000.00 would pay 30.0% Tax Rate. PLUS.

[14.0] Income earned from $1,000,000,000.01 and up would pay 35.0% Tax Rate.

I would also create a Financial Transaction Fee of $ .50 on each and every Financial Transaction, to generate from $2 to $3 Trillion in Revenue to “Reduce the Deficit and to Invest in our future, our Infrastructure and our middle class.”

U.S. Corporate Income Taxes that were actually paid (the effective rate) fell to a 40 year low of 12.1 percent in fiscal year 2011, despite corporate profits rebounding to their Pre-Great Recession heights. The United States of America, both taxes its Corporations less and raises less in revenue from corporate taxes than its foreign competitors.

Therefore; under my Corporate Tax Rate Corporations would pay 20.0% Income Tax Rate with NO Exceptions, No Exemptions and the NO Deductions. Or they can pay the same Tax Rates as an Individual, seeing as the Supreme Court has ruled they have the same Right to Freedom of Speech, therefore they should have the same Right to pay the same Income Tax Rates. Corporations should not make Business decisions based upon the Income Tax Loopholes, they should be based on what is the best thing for the Corporation, Employees and the Investors. The top 500 Corporations, Companies, Institutions and Organizations within the Fortune 500, Pay No Taxes today. This Income Tax Plan would ensure that all Corporations, Companies, Institutions or for Profit Organizations that earned a Profit would PAY TAXES.

I am sending this to Bill O'Reilly

Atlasr

April 25, 2012 6:10pm

Hi goofy-- so if you take in $100 in sales or income but it costs you$110 in expenses to generate the $100 in revenues you want the poor guy to still pay 15% of $100 in taxes even though he has less money than he started with at the beginning of the year. Income taxes says and is a tax on profits or positive income--

What would be fair is a national sales tax- eliminate all this paperwork and tax purchases-

André Simonyi

April 25, 2012 12:43pm

I echo teabagged2death in saying that few people at Fox have read Marx. They should. They should also re-visit history and the dangers of monopolistic capitalism taking over every and any form of democracy. It's called fascism I believe.

Atlasr

April 25, 2012 6:27pm

Fascism comes at the muzzle of government armed thugs not from corporations. The destruction comes from government manipulating marketplaces for personal benefit or through desire for power-- would you imvest in an alternative energy company today that will have to compete with companies funded by the government which controls all the rules of the game? You should revisit history- find one socialist government that didn't collapse after several generations. Did you ever hear of the Soviet Union?

When did China prosper? When they opened their economy to free market capitalism.

You just can't say look at history and act like history supports socialism - name an example? We are witnessing the collapse of European socialism even now-- " eventually you run out of other people's money"-- wonder if you know who said this accurate statement- you should know as a great student of history.

You probably support deficit spending to grow the economy also-- As if that creates real jobs.

Bill Gates created jobs and Steve Jobs created jobs and Edison created jobs and Walt Disney created jobs-- real jobs - read a little history- the more capitalism the lower the poverty rate and the more socialist the country is in design the greater the poverty and the lower personal freedom.

Ever notice East Germany and West Germany or how well North Korea has prospered as compared to South Korea? Real world tests using millions of humans despite decades of deprivation to prove to knuckleheads like yourself that socialism is not workable.

Following Ww 2- how did Russia fair as compared to America? How did Poland or czechoslovakia do compared to Japan or South Korea or west germany and on and on.

History does not support your foolish socialist agenda just because you say it does.

Tosh

April 26, 2012 6:08pm

Cuba did not collapse. It's struggling, but has the best healthcare system in the world. The USA should embrace the Cuban people.

China is still communist, despite the U.S.'s preferred trading partner agenda. Thanks to NAFTA, all our manufacturing jobs went there.

Socialism is not communism. Learn the difference before you add your inane comments.

BozoAdult

April 26, 2012 5:36am

Allowing corporations to usurp representative democracy results in fascism.

"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini

Allen Levy

April 25, 2012 12:42pm

Here's the problem. By saying stubstantive things on The Daily Show, which surrounds substantive things with laughter, Reich gets a rise out of O'Reilly because nobody cares what Reich says on MSNBC or on the Sunday talking heads talkshows, which he is increasingly not invited to and which nobody watches anyway. So, his comments are trivialized and become just part of the fun of watching The Daily Show. The result? A wised-up, cynical audience that thinks they know things, but are too busy laughing to do anything about them. They laugh at the idiots. And, as any psychologist will tell you, laughter is the enemy of anger. So, sadly, we laugh so hard that we do not send a letter to the editor, we do not write (email) our rep in Washington, we don't join Occupy. I enjoy the Daily Show, but to say that Jon Stewart is today's Walter Cronkite is sad. We are indeed being Amused to Death. I like The Daily Show, but I know it is dangerous for democracy

wordgrl

April 25, 2012 1:13pm

Thank you, Allen Levy, for putting into words what has been inchoate. I wondered why I got a bad feeling when I heard friends say, "I get my news from The Daily Show". Though I'm glad Prof. Reich is getting the word out about his book and his ideas, I fear that being in the comedy context diminishes the importance of his ideas.

Tosh

April 26, 2012 5:57pm

Neither of you has a clue about the influence of The Daily Show, or the Colbert Report. They have a massive progressive audience. I know, I'm one.

Allen Levy

April 25, 2012 2:13pm

Word: Yes. If people get their news from The Daily Show, they are using what is called recognition knowledge/memory. In other words, they recognize something is going on, not exactly knowing what it is, and then they laugh at it. What is needed is something called recall knowledge/memory, that sticks with people after the show is over, after the laughter has subsided, so that we can then do something about it.

Norman Allen

April 25, 2012 12:10pm

Bill Oh, get Really! should be sent to a mental asylum. He is bullying anyone who advocate socio-economic-political justice, anyone whose thought process is science based instead of dogmas of the right (advocating magical solutions to scientific problems). Take him out of his talk show to a logical forum where issues would be discuss in a logical, dignified manner, he would melt away like ice cube (made of urine) in a hot day. Oh, Really knows Professor Reich is right. That is why Mr. ice cube made of urine is so frothy at the mouth.

edward liu

April 25, 2012 10:44am

Robert Reich, justaposed side by side with Robert Rubin, both "FOBs" ("Friends of Bill) has demonstrated that he is one clean, honest, decent, kind public servant. He was never "on the take;" and he never took license with his officialdom and play fast and loose with the "revolving door" between public office and Wall Street. Unlike others in the "FOBs" circle of fast and loose opportunists, Reich is one rare Democrat, one of the few "clean ones" left, who is not corrupted by "pay to play" politics.
Keep up the good fight, Robert Reich. You have at least one admirer ... a yellow man from America's most Asian city -- San Francisco.

BozoAdult

April 26, 2012 4:47am

I'm with you, Edward.

anie

April 25, 2012 10:42am

I openly adore Karl Marx.

edward liu

April 25, 2012 10:39am

Robert Reich, a pinko commie and worshipper of Karl Marx? You must be kidding ! Bob Reich is just a good ole Jewish intellectual mench with a kind, decent heart for the little people. He is one Democrat that I can relate to.... unlike that "Great Black Hope" who has turned out to be all jive full of hot air, with no substance. Keep up the good fight, Bob Reich. You are the conscience of America, which is in dire shortage at this juncture of its history, of good, honest intellectuals and academics who are not corrupted nor obsessed with "getting rich." For the jobless, disillusioned, debt-crushed college kids and graduates.... I feel your pain and anger. I will join you in the barricades when the confrontation erupts.

Atlasr

April 25, 2012 6:35pm

College kids debt crushed to pay a salary to reich- who produces nothing and teaches economics classes espousing the valuable economic lessons learned from the Soviet union, north korea, greece, East Germany and every other socialist regime that has failed their citizens and doomed themcto crushing poverty. Old Bob sure isn't offering to take a lower salary at Harvard and guess who is borrowing money to pay his salary and support the fancy acedemic club with fancy meals and discounted prices?

Competing with competent people in the free market world is daunting - we do need to supply some sustenance to the ill equipped and those unable to compete-- oh yeah-- college professor jobs are very very hard to get these days sorry.

G.E.R.R.Y.

April 27, 2012 4:25pm

"...the Soviet union, north korea, greece, East Germany and every other socialist regime that has failed their citizens and doomed themcto crushing poverty"

I think we are in the process of watching America failing its citizens and dooming them to crushing poverty, unemployment, housing foreclosures...

All you need to do is drop your phobia about socialism and look all around you. The education system is abysmal, the healthcare system is the most expensive AND ONE OF THE LEAST EFFECTIVE in the western world...but you are such an anti-social little pissant that you cannot believe even what your own eyes must tell you. Pathetic really...

Tosh

April 26, 2012 5:47pm

Huh? Think before posting, billo.

William Molloy

April 25, 2012 10:38am

Nice job Mr. Reich, it would seem you have them running scared about something or another...Oh wait, silly me, it's the facts that scare them.. Well, nice job anyway, You sometimes have to go some to get on there hit list..

teabagged2Death

April 25, 2012 9:02am

In pre-Reagan California schools, students were taught current events that allowed us to carry on intelligent conversations. Teachers instructed that small talk was the lowest form of communication and that nobody wants sound like an uneducated boor.

Technological science produces machines that are now smarter than those using them. Due to budget cuts and the inevitable national dumb-down that followed in the 70's and 80's, computers, as well as cell phones, are currently being mis-used by a nation full of people whose intellectual level is inadequate for sensible debate. Now there is only mindless texting.

We were also taught that our constitutional rights should never infringe upon the rights of others and if one ignores the ignorant, they will eventually grow weary, and then stop speaking, either from a sore throat or out of frustration of appearing to be stupid.

We were also taught to read as many books as possible in order to obtain wisdom and that all books are good, not just one. It is obvious that Bill O'Reilly has never read Karl Marx, since everyone who reads it becomes an instant Marxist. It is doubtful he can read anything not on a monitor.

Do you really want to appear with this Alleged Journalist, only to face the usual barrage of loaded questions with only one 15-second byte to answer after a 5 minute commercial break that allows those mindless viewers who have already made up their minds that you're a Commie Rat, to switch channels?

"So, Perfesser, as you pro-fess yerself to be, and that, My Fellow Amerikkkans, is questionable at best, are all of you Alleged Educators a part of this Great Communist Conspiracy against the Good Ole US of A, or is it just you? We'll be back with that and many other in-depth questions for our unbiased panel of Real Professors, after this word from Devry, so stay tuned, Amerikkka!"

What are the odds he'll invite you? Like my pappy used to say I when asked to drive his new car at age 16: "You have 3 chances kiddo: Slim, fat and no chance at all!"

BozoAdult

April 26, 2012 4:42am

I do not understand why anyone would appear on Fox "News". This only lends Fox credence they do not deserve.