Mike David
NationofChange / Op-Ed
Published: Monday 17 September 2012
“Our growing sense of isolation and disconnection, whether from ourselves, from those next door to us, or from those producing our food and products halfway across the globe, is why we’re occupying.”

Why Are We Occupying?

Article image

Why are we occupying? Or to put it another way – what’s wrong with the world

Of course, most of us know what’s wrong with the world. We know about the poverty, war, violence and disease. We’re conscious of the injustice, but not fully conscious of it, because frankly, we have enough to worry about in our own lives. As such, we’ve come to accept these injustices as simple facts of life – prepackaged side effects of the human condition, as natural and intertwined with our existence as water to a stream, beyond our capacity to effect in any significant way. This collective sense of powerlessness and default apathy is why we’re occupying.

Our growing sense of isolation and disconnection, whether from ourselves, from those next door to us, or from those producing our food and products halfway across the globe, is why we’re occupying. Our forced support of perpetual war waged for and by the 1% - whether explicitly with speech, or implicitly with inaction and tax dollars - without ever paying mind to the true causes and motives behind it, is why we’re occupying. Our failure up till now to connect the dots and realize that the benefits of a cheap iPod, lovely as it may be, would be far outweighed by the benefits of a truly just world free of exploitation, is why we’re occupying.

The fact that most of us are too busy being exploited to realize we’re being exploited – too busy greasing the cogs of our economic system to notice how the fruits of our labor never fail to float up and out of our reach - is why we’re occupying, as is the fact that most aren’t able to do anything about this exploitation even when we do notice it. While some of us are lucky enough to have jobs and careers that give real meaning to our lives, allowing us to take full advantage of our talents and fulfill our destiny, most of us have jobs devoid of meaning and dignity, yet full of the feeling that we are fulfilling someone else’s destiny. Our recognition that the ruling class’s seat at the top of the pyramid is prepared and propped up by the working class is why we’re occupying. Our knowledge that it’s actually the CEO who is the most dependent among us, and that the ones truly indispensable to our society are not bankers, lobbyists and politicians, but workers, teachers and engineers, is why we’re occupying.

Indeed, the fact that we have an economic system which functions in the same manner as a virus is why we’re occupying. Just as a virus’s only reason for existence is to expand, without regard or awareness of the effect of its expansion on its host body, our economic system pursues its infinite expansion without regard or awareness of its effect on human welfare or the environment. Though the earth is finite, it is sustainable, so we reject, in the words of Michael Nagler, “the inherent contradiction of an economy based on indefinitely increasing wants – instead of on human needs that the planet has ample resources to fulfill.”

We’re occupying because we also reject the notion that selfishness must be the driving force in our world. We believe, contrary to propaganda, that most people in our world are not selfish, and would rather work together than constantly compete against each other. We believe the only ones who really care about things like power, corporate monopolies and global dominance only make up, say, 1% of the population, making it seem only logical that we should have an economic system which reflects the values of the 99% of us who don’t care about such things. The fact that most of the decisions which have a profound impact on how we go about our daily lives are made by folks in Washington or Wall Street, rather than in our communities by the people actually affected by those decisions, is why we’re occupying. The fact that power rests only with those who lust after it is why we’re occupying.

We’re occupying because another notion we don’t buy into is the presumption that the profit motive can have no outcome other than the best possible one. We understand that the success of McDonald’s has nothing to do with having the best burger, and everything to do with having the most cutthroat business plan. We understand that building prisons, waging wars, polluting the environment, and paying employees inadequate wages are actually quite profitable. Sustainability, economic justice and true equality? Not so much. We understand that being ruthless and unscrupulous is an economic advantage, and being truthful and virtuous is an economic disadvantage. We understand that money is treated as more natural and inviolable as nature itself, and that too often our place and perceived value in society is determined solely by how much of it we make, or how much of it we make for someone else. We understand that, whether or not you believe in climate change, our ability to adequately address it or any other pressing issue is greatly compromised when our shortsighted need for profit always skews our vision of the whole. We’re occupying to suggest new motives and new values going forward.

The fact that you might not have known why we’re occupying, and you didn’t get and maybe still don’t get what Occupy Wall Street is about, is why we’re occupying. And who can blame you? Just like you don’t have the time or energy to really do anything about the world’s problems, you probably don’t have the time or energy to do the deep digging and deep thinking required to get your news and views from any source other than the corporate outlets conveniently floating on the surface. It’s understandable that you wouldn’t see the inherent conflict of interest of a handful of for-profit corporations with their own interests telling the world's story to the majority of people in this country. The fact that it's so hard to be truly informed, and that it's in the 1%'s interest for the majority of us to be uninformed, is why we're occupying. The fact that it’s entirely possible you haven’t heard a thing lately about the numerous growing people’s and consciousness movements all over the world, but it’s equally possible you’ve heard plenty about the latest stupid thing some athlete or celebrity said, is why we're occupying. The fact that you think the Occupy movement is dead simply because the corporate media isn’t reporting on it is why we’re occupying.

To counter the charge that it's unrealistic, and overly idealistic, to want to bring about real change in our world, as well as the trusty "life’s not fair" rationale always used to justify injustice, is why we're occupying. We didn't accept that line of reasoning during the civil rights movement, and we don't accept it now. We think it’s far more unrealistic to think that a small cadre of elites will be able to keep up their never-ending pursuit of power consolidation and mass manipulation without waking us up in the process. We think it’s far more unlikely that in 100 years, humanity will still be playing this game of perpetual one-upmanship, instead of picking up the far more efficient and beneficial manner of interacting with each other in honesty, cooperation and genuine respect.

Perhaps the biggest reason we’re occupying is to simply exercise that ever-cherished American value of freedom. Just as our business leaders are free to act in their own self-interest, we are free to act in ours. And by the way, even if you don’t support the Occupy movement, whatever you think the Occupy movement is about, we respect your view, because another reason we’re occupying has to do with our political system – the way it thrives and prospers from pitting us against ourselves, encouraging us to demonize each other while discouraging us from disagreeing civilly.

The fact that this post is completely and utterly inadequate in expressing why we're occupying, is why we're occupying. But that's OK, because like year one, this post is just the beginning.

Happy anniversary, Occupy Wall Street!



Get Email Alerts from NationofChange
ABOUT Mike David

 

Mike David is a freelance writer, independent journalist and Occupy activist living in San Francisco, where he writes about social justice, the new paradigm, and a variety of other topics. His work has appeared in Adbusters, Common Dreams, Reader Supported News, Peninsula Peace and Justice Center, and others. He blogs at primitivetimes.com.

Top Stories

9 comments on "Why Are We Occupying?"

vbstein

September 23, 2012 7:27am

I believe that, in order to make changes in our economic system, it would be helpful to convince those Wall Streeters and CEO's that providing an economic system that is fair to all will not destroy either democracy itself or their ability to accumulate wealth. Many conservative leaning people of wealth live in fear that a more just economic system that distributes wealth more evenly than it presently does will somehow destroy their lives and our country. Convincing them that a system that makes everyone's life better with greater opportunity for all who strive and work hard is better for our country than one that allows fewer and fewer to accumulate wealth is important to make progress toward this goal.

FullBlad

September 17, 2012 5:07pm

Beautifully written words of conviction to the cause of human justice for all. Will this world envisioned ever be attained? Not without the people believing and working for it. Occupy the world...and your own soul.

majorpayne

September 19, 2012 3:58pm

When I was a child, my parents and teachers taught me to study hard, work hard, get a decent job, save for retirement, and enjoy life. When I was in high school, working at a part-time job, I was torn between being a band director and being a test pilot. The head of one of the best schools of music in the world advised that the music field was financially pretty tough, and engineers could still enjoy music as a hobby. I took his advice and soon found that most of the members of my university's "show band" were STEM majors. Playing in dance bands, grading papers, working weekends at a museum, and waiting tables during summers at a resort paid the bills until I got my first engineering degree with enough money left over to buy a new car. I had two successful careers spanning 31 years, one as an engineer and the second as a technical editor, and I expect to enjoy my favorite hobby until the last day I have enough breath left t0 blow a horn.

I never needed to spend a day begging the 1% for a job or blaming anyone else for not offering me one. A similar plan would work for anyone today just as well as it did for me. Every STEM field and many others are still wide open for anyone who is willing to put forth the effort to do something marketable that a robot can't do.

Winston Churchill, Albert Einstein, Albert Schweitzer, Richard Nixon, Harry Truman, Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, and Condoleeza Rice were (or are) all pretty decent musicians, but none of them ever considered doing something fun for a living and busing tables to pick up a few extra bucks. Do you suppose Barack Obama ever wanted to play basketball for a living?

CaptVic

September 17, 2012 2:33pm

"The fact that you think the Occupy movement is dead simply because the corporate media isn’t reporting on it is why we’re occupying."

Reading some of the posts, I see the diversity of views on this site. And I see the different places that we are coming from. I have been impressed by a large portion of OWS. Of course OWS is not going to fit everybody's picture as to how they think OWS should look and behave. But that is what life is really like. This is a great article if you READ it. Also remember that change does not happen overnight. It took us a long time to get here and it will take work and time to turn this around.

Richard Townsend

September 17, 2012 12:06pm

OWS is now nothing but a random collection of unorganized groups wandering the landscape and no two have the same goals. I detest the Tea Party groups that have been manipulated by various power brokers on the Right to support their specific causes but lets take a look at the current scoreboard. Tea Party: elected a large number of their ilk to Congress in 2010 and will likely go to the polls to insure their continued service in 2012, OWS: Run out of every city where they have set up shop. I saw the protesters in the 1960s hitting the streets to protest issues that directly effected their lives such as a mandatory military draft and endless military actions such as Viet Nam. The Nixon administration ended the military draft in 1973, almost forty years ago, to get these people off the streets and off their backs and the protesters all but vanished from the scene now that fighting these ongoing resource wars was somebody else's responsibility. Many of OWS's problems come from the large number of senior academics who were the kids of WWII and Depression era parents who learned through tough economic times how to join forces to reclaim their rights and freedoms. Their children had relatively prosperous childhoods through the late 1940s, 50s, and 60s where they became student protesters attending prestige's universities to avoid the same service their parents had proudly performed two decades earlier. Now these senior educators are reliving their past protest experiences through the actions of today's youth that they are supporting and directing to follow in their foot steps with the sole purpose of teaching them to only take care of number one. When you think about it both sides are now promoting an on-your-ownership society, the basis of totalitarian societies everywhere. Can we really be surprised by the current state of affairs, after all, things have been moving in this direction for over forty years !

majorpayne

September 17, 2012 12:05pm

What's wrong with our world, which lies pretty much within our own national borders, is of our own making. Our constitution was flawed, even in the minds of its framers. More than two dozen amendments later, it is even worse, mainly because constitutional lawyers and courts keep trying to interpret meanings of words and concepts that became obsolete centuries ago.
The Occupy Movement, a largely ignorant, jobless mob that doesn't have anything better to do, is not going to improve anything. The latest I hear from every source except those who wishfully still promote the movement is that it has passed its peak.
Snake-oil salesmen have been with us since the Garden of Eden. They just have better advertising now, and the ignorant masses are still ignorant.

umbrarchist

September 17, 2012 11:51am

Why don't we have double entry accounting occupy every high school student? If that had been done since the 1960s would we have these economic problems now?

Norman Allen

September 17, 2012 10:35am

The OWS should focus on the money stolen from the middle class (exporting their jobs, increasing their taxes/fees/life expenses) and using their kids for corporate wars to enrich the 1% at the expense of the 99%. The government has over $15 trillion deficit. There is $32 trillion in offshore accounts belonging to the wealthy that seemingly has been hoarded by taking it from the middle and lower classes. The government and the media is totally silent about that little BIG fact and should pursue investigation to determine if that money is legal or siphoned from the tax system. If laundered and stolen, it should be taken back and pay the national debt. If legal, that shows how callous the hoarders are watching people die from starvation while their money is parked in offshore accounts doing nothing. That money should be invested in the US for jobs and improving the economy for all.

Anacortesrealtor

September 17, 2012 10:02am

The reason why we are occupying should be summed up as follows:

My life has changed because what happened after 9/11 forced me to come out of denial. Denial that I didn’t even know I had. It forced me to recognize the fact that during the Bush-Cheney administration our great United States of America willingly sacrificed American blood for Mid East countries’ oil. It forced me to recognize that we do not in practice have two governing parties in our U.S. Congress. Instead of the Republican Party and the Democratic Party in actual practice we only have one party. That one party is the U.S. Corporations Party. And that one party, especially since 9/11, has been in absolute control of our U.S. Congress. Government of the people by the Lobbyists for the rich and powerful U.S. Corporations made it easy for our great nation to sacrifice blood for oil. In addition to the controlling influence our U.S. Big Oil corporations have, we also have experienced the controlling influence of our Big U.S. banks and Investment firms. Specifically evidenced by the way many billions of dollars worth of fraudulent Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS’) were created by Wall Street and sold to “unsuspecting” and naïve pension fund managers and investors. The result of all of the above actions caused our financial crash in 2008. When adding the unpaid cost of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars to the fraudulent Wall Street MBS investment packages the sum equals the Multi Trillion Dollar Debt which we are now experiencing. We cannot permit our gridlocked Congress to continue in its present condition. There is only one way to heal our Congress and that is by taking the money out of politics. And the only way to do that is with a simple Amendment to our Constitution. To see how and why that is done click on, or copy and paste into your browser this link: http://signon.org/sign/take-money-out-of-politics