You are viewing the NationofChange archives. For the latest news and actions, visit the new
Get Email Updates | Log In | Register

Jeff Bryant
Published: Friday 12 August 2011
The reformist joke of a solution is to recommend that the nation adopt the education policies of the state with the highest percentage of failing schools.

You Can’t Waive the Reality of Our Public Schools

Article image

So much for the "New Washington Consensus on Education".

Education policy, we were told by conservative leaders merely six months ago, was a " redeeming feature" of the Obama administration that would provide DC policy makers with a tranquil eddy amidst the whitewater of American politics.

The New Consensus was forged on the idea that federal policies governing the nation's schools could enforce “tight” restrictions on what we expect public schools to make students and teachers "do," as long as the governing policies remained "loose" about how we make them do it.

The last glimpse of this glorious, technocratic vision slipped out from an embargoed presser in the wee hours of Monday morning, when Secretary of Education Arne Duncan admitted that the once heralded goals of No Child Left Behind were unachievable and that states could blow them off as long as they could persuade a yet-to-be-announced group of peers that they were adhering to a yet-to-be-defined definition of "accountability."

The announcement was in every way a rendering unto the "tight, loose" edicts of the New Washington Consensus. Yet even this vague illusion of a policy -- an administrative excusereally, for the complete and utter failure of NCLB -- was met with resounding disapproval from all sides in the once still-waters of edu-policy.

Republican education policy leaders had already expressed opposition to waivers with conditions. And Republicans from states with large populations of rural schools have already declared that the Obama "Blueprint" for education policy, which many speculate that Duncan's waiver requirements will draw from, is basically unworkable in their states.

Even education policy makers in the Democratic party have expressed skepticism about waiving NCLB "growth targets" for specific student populations. And Duncan's announcement generated only tepid expressions of"understanding" of "where Duncan is coming from." This hardly constitutes a strong base for strong-arming policy through a reluctant legislative body.

Secretary Duncan's once-reliable "reform" backers, true champions of the New Consensus, were mostly vehement in their criticism -- slamming it as a "back door" strategy, a grasp for "greater presidential authority," and a "gambit"pleasing no one. It seemed the best support that Duncan could get from the self-anointed reformers would be the incoherent declaration from loyal ally Michelle Rhee that waiving NCLB "accountability" is okay only if the government enforces "rigorous accountability." (Huh?)

And those who've long opposed NCLB were uniformly and unsurprisingly critical of the waiver plan.

So in the place of the New (now Old) Washington Consensus on Education, what we're left with is a truly ungovernable stalemate in which the rudderless ship of state founders on the shoals of entrenched political positions in DC while waves of budget cuts lash at the gunwales and privateers plunder the hold.

Teacher and edu-blogger Doug Noon correctly likens the situation that education policy finds itself in to the "Doom Loop" determining our nation's economic policy:

With a slight adjustment, Paul Krugman’s analysis of the S&P downgrade works for education reform as well.Krugman"1. US debt is downgraded, sparking demands for more ill-advised fiscal austerity2. Fears that austerity will depress the economy send stocks down3. Politicians and pundits declare that worries about US solvency are the culprit, even though interest rates have actually plunged4. This leads to calls for even more ill-advised austerity, which sends us back to #2"Applied to education reform:1. US schools are criticized, sparking demands for ill-advised standardized testing2. Fears that testing is dominating the curriculum send confidence in schools down3. Politicians and pundits declare that teacher effectiveness is the culprit, even though instruction is focused on tested material4. This leads to calls for even more ill-advised testing, which sends us back to #2And back to Krugman for the zinger, “Behold the power of a stupid narrative, which seems impervious to evidence.”Really, how much of an appetite for this shit do we have?

Apparently, quite a lot. Already, plenty of states have lined up for the chance at a waiver even before the requirements have been spelled out. Short-term grasps at straws, it seems, are what our political leaders are willing to accept.

But there is a real consequence of this short-term gaming in place of long-term leadership to all of us down here on the ground. As my colleague Dave Johnson has so insightfully observed here on this blog, "government spending cuts don't cut, they shift costs." And as the first wave of school openings rolls out this week and next, the "shift" is going to hit the fan in our nation's school hallways and classrooms.

How this new reality for the nation's schools works is that parents get hit for costs they never had to pay in the past,children who are the most in need -- such as poor kids with no access to books and children with developmental issues -- get blocked out of early childhood programskindergarten programs are closed, and families who live in remote areas are told to take a hike if they care about getting their son or daughter to school.

The reformist joke of a solution is to recommend that the nation adopt the education policies of the state with the highest percentage of failing schools.

But what we really don't need is another Michelle Rhee-type grand plan for "innovation" that, "after replacing 50% of the teaching staff in the regular public schools, paying huge fees and salaries to self-described experts, and shipping over one-third of the student population to essentially unregulated charter schools," produces "basically, nothing." (hat tip: Tom Hoffman)

What we need instead is, first, for the broadcast media's staging of "back to school season" to shun the Michelle Rhee's and Bill Gates'es of the world and take a look at the real, hard truth of the nation's disinvestment in public education. Listen instead to this LA teacher who explains why she can't be "excellent" when school cuts and teacher lay-offs force her to deal with a class of "31 students, including two with learning disabilities, one who just moved here from Mexico, one with serious behavior problems, 10 who flunked this class last year and are repeating, seven who test below grade level, three who show up halfway through class every day, one who almost never comes, [and a] brainiac who's so bored she's reading 'Lolita' under her desk."

Instead of running more puff pieces on "wonderful" charter schools that the edu-philanthropists shower with money, follow edu-blogger Nancy Flanagan as she gives an eyewitness account of the decay we've allowed our traditional public schools to fall into:

And then there was the building itself, which reeked, literally, of neglect--from broken, filthy blinds (essential for shutting out the hot glare of the sun) to gummy floors to mismatched windows with security mesh embedded. The kindergarten "playground"--a crumbling concrete square--looked like a prison yard, and the auditorium floor was littered with broken glass. Boxes of unused teaching materials, ordered decades ago, were stacked everywhere. The principal told me that 90% of her workday since she was hired, in June, has been taken up with a frustrating quest to get some action on urgent and critical facility needs.Teachers were hauling years' worth of dusty trash into the hallways, armed with disinfecting wipes, spray cleaner and contact paper. Interactive white boards had been used as bulletin boards; teachers were exchanging tips on removing tape residue and whose husband had the power drill to put up shower board from Home Depot over old, cracked chalkboards.

And what we need is real leadership -- real leadership like what we just saw from North Carolina's gutsy governor Bev Perdue who announced yesterday that she will defy the state Tea Party inspired budget that blocks at-risk children from early childhood programs. It's sad but true that standing up for the welfare of children in the face of rapacious greed from the most powerful people has now become the hardest thing for leaders to do in our society. But there you have it.

Only that combination -- confronting truth and real leadership -- can get us out of this Doom Loop we find ourselves in. Waivers won't help.

Author pic
ABOUT Jeff Bryant

Jeff Bryant is a Marketing and Communications Consultant for Nonprofits. He is a marketing and creative strategist with nearly 30 years of experience – the past 20 on his own – as a freelance writer, consultant, and SEM provider. He's written extensively about public education policy, most recently at and NationofChange.

j34Pql ppdkesayoqep

j34Pql ppdkesayoqep

oOJ9DK ozevemgalzbw

oOJ9DK ozevemgalzbw

At last! Somoene who

At last! Somoene who understands! Thanks for posting!

There are standardrized test

There are standardrized test scores. such as the Iowa. My suggestion. teach using socratic method (inquiry). small classes k-3.We could also use inquiry based learnining, which is similar (this could be first job to help some college grads work off a portion of debt. ). They would work as aides. School buildings need to be fixed up... and as someone who has seen just a little bit of effort clean up the school, and keep it there , districts can leverage more help than we know. What happened to poor but honest? Low income people fix up their own homes, knowing they will not have a mansion or a a or use a contractor. I went to a one room school for a time and it was not filthy. We all had jobs to keep our place clean. Why? because it was important to all of us.

David D's picture

End no child left behind.

End no child left behind. Teach our children critical thought and throw away the standardized tests.

Thank you for this insightful

Thank you for this insightful piece.

Interesting you should bring in a Krugman analysis about S&P's downgrading. Many people don't know that S&P is owned by textbook publisher Mc-Graw Hill. Indeed, this corporation is the umbrella for many industries--heavy on finance. Click on

This may all change if activist hedge fund investor, Jana Partners gets involved. See this NY Times article.

Hedge funds and private equities love highly leveraged industries. They are good with the job hatchet to maximize profits as Geoff Fox speculates in his blog.

"If you work for McGraw Hill this is at best bad news for you. It’s possibly terrible news. By splitting the company into bite sized chunks you’ll basically be chum in the water as Jana looks for buyers. In many cases those buyers are currently your competitors. When they buy you they might already have someone who does what you do. Your entire business entity could just disappear. Poof. The valuable stuff will be sold, but without you.

I guess it’s a free market, so Jana or anyone should be able to buy and sell businesses as they please. I just want to make sure the tax implications match the actual circumstances. This may be good for Jana, but it’s bad for the nation. Jobs will surely be lost. Businesses will be swallowed whole. There will be less competition.

We shouldn’t have tax laws that encourage this. This is only a good deal if you define good in a very selfish way!"

Read this March USA Today article, "When standardized test scores soared in D.C., were the gains real?" Michelle Rhee is at center stage. Along with McGraw Hill standardized tests.

Testing. 1... 2... 3...

There is no standardized test for democracy. Time to fight this class warfare!

Comment with your Facebook account

Comment with your Disqus account

Top Stories

comments powered by Disqus

NationofChange works to educate, inform, and fight power with people, corruption with community.

If you would like to stay up to date with the best in independent, filter-free journalism, updates on upcoming events to attend, and more, enter your email below:

7 Compelling Reasons Why You Should Support NationofChange

Our readers often tell us why they’ve decided to step up and become supporters. Here are some of the top reasons people are giving.

1. You’re keeping independent journalism alive
The corporate owned media has proven that it can’t be trusted. In a media landscape wrought with spin and corruption, NationofChange stands in very scarce company.

2. You’re sticking it to the rich, powerful, and corrupt
When you have money in this country you can get away with damn near anything, and they do. NationofChange isn’t afraid to expose these criminals no matter how powerful they are.

3. Your donation is 100% tax-deductible
NationofChange is a 501(c)3 charity. People tend to assume that many other organizations are (most nonprofits are NOT) but it’s that 501(c)3 status is a bit more rare than you think.

Read the rest...