Meta platforms under fire for blocking abortion pill providers’ posts

Meta’s content moderation policies spark new concerns amidst Trump’s anti-abortion agenda.

206
SOURCENationofChange
FILE PHOTO: A smartphone with Facebook's logo is seen with new rebrand logo Meta in this illustration taken October 28, 2021. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration/File Photo

Quick Summary:

• Meta platforms, including Instagram and Facebook, have been blocking, blurring, or removing posts from abortion pill providers like Aid Access, Women Help Women, and Just the Pill.

• Meta claimed the actions were due to “overenforcement” of rules prohibiting pharmaceutical sales without proper certification, not linked to recent changes in moderation policies.

• Instagram suspended several abortion pill providers’ accounts, citing violations of “Community Standards on guns, drugs, and other restricted goods,” though the accounts were later reinstated.

• Advocacy groups like Amnesty International have criticized Meta for suppressing abortion-related content and failing to uphold international human rights standards.

• Meta’s moderation changes—including removing fact-checking teams and relaxing hate speech policies—follow CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s $1 million donation to Trump’s inauguration campaign.

• Abortion providers warn these actions exacerbate barriers to accessing critical reproductive healthcare information, aligning with anti-abortion policies.

• Critics suggest Meta’s decisions may reflect efforts to align with the Trump administration’s anti-abortion stance, raising concerns about corporate compliance with political agendas.

Meta platforms Instagram and Facebook have been accused of censorship after blocking and hiding posts from abortion pill providers, including Aid Access, Women Help Women, Just the Pill, and Hey Jane. According to a report by The New York Times, Meta confirmed that it blurred some posts and suspended accounts associated with these providers. These actions have reportedly increased in frequency following Donald Trump’s inauguration.

Meta’s actions have reignited criticism over its moderation policies. “When tech companies remove abortion-related information, they can intensify barriers to accessing information and lead to discrimination and human rights violations against people who can become pregnant,” said Jane Eklund, Tech and Reproductive Rights Fellow with Amnesty International USA. “Access to accurate and unbiased information about abortion is an essential part of reproductive healthcare, and tech companies must do better to ensure their users can access that information.”

Meta attributed some of the incidents to “overenforcement” of its rules prohibiting pharmaceutical drug sales without proper certification. However, activists argue that the timing of these account suspensions and content removals coincides with Meta’s recent policy changes, including the elimination of third-party fact-checking teams and the relaxation of hate speech policies.

Rebecca Davis, head of marketing at Hey Jane, noted that the company’s Instagram account became unsearchable on the platform, saying, “a similar issue occurred in 2023 but was later resolved by Meta.” The accounts of Women Help Women and Just the Pill were also temporarily suspended, with Meta citing alleged violations of its “Community Standards on guns, drugs and other restricted goods.” Both accounts have since been reinstated.

Critics of Meta claim the company’s recent moves suggest a willingness to align with the anti-abortion stance of the Trump administration. “Once again, ‘freedom of speech’ doesn’t actually mean free speech, but rather speech approved by right-wing Christian nationalists,” said LGBTQ legislative researcher Allison Chapman. “We are days into the Trump presidency and businesses are already preemptively complying in order to win the favor of Trump and his cronies.”

Meta’s moderation practices have faced ongoing scrutiny. In 2022, Instagram blocked posts mentioning abortion after the overturning of Roe v. Wade, attributing the action to a “technical glitch.” Similarly, a 2024 Amnesty International report criticized Meta for removing abortion-related content without providing clear explanations or sufficient transparency about its decisions.

The recent wave of post blocking and account suspensions has added to concerns that major tech platforms are restricting access to vital reproductive healthcare information. Advocates continue to call for greater accountability, transparency, and consistency in Meta’s moderation practices, urging the company to ensure its platforms are not contributing to discrimination or infringing on users’ rights to access essential information.

FALL FUNDRAISER

If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.

[give_form id="735829"]

COMMENTS