Media bias towards Israel in Gaza coverage exposed in new report

The study uncovered a clear imbalance in the portrayal of casualties and narratives.


A recent analysis by The Intercept has cast a spotlight on major U.S. news outlets, revealing a significant bias towards Israel in their coverage of the ongoing conflict in Gaza. Advocates for Palestinian rights, who have long criticized such biases, find their concerns validated by this new study.

The analysis scrutinized over 1,100 articles from The New York Times, The Washington Post, and the Los Angeles Times, specifically focusing on the first six weeks following the Oct. 7 Hamas attack. Researcher Othman Ali and writer Adam Johnson conducted the study, aiming to provide quantitative evidence of media bias.

The study uncovered a clear imbalance in the portrayal of casualties and narratives. It revealed that Palestinian casualties and suffering were consistently underrepresented or described with less emotional weight compared to Israeli casualties. This was evident in the selective use of emotionally charged words.

In detailing the death tolls, the study found stark differences in language. Terms like “slaughter” and “massacre” were predominantly used for Israeli deaths, while their usage for Palestinian casualties was notably sparse. This discrepancy was stark, considering the significantly higher Palestinian death toll since Oct. 7.

The report noted a marked lack of coverage on the impact of the conflict on Gazan children and the unusually high number of journalists killed. Despite being one of the deadliest conflicts for children in recent history, major U.S. newspapers rarely used the term “children” in their headlines or articles when referring to Gazan victims.

An imbalance was also observed in the coverage of antisemitism versus Islamophobia. Following the Oct. 7 attack, the three major outlets mentioned antisemitism far more frequently than Islamophobia, despite the rise of both in the U.S.

The Intercept’s report follows another investigation revealing CNN’s Gaza coverage being overseen by their Jerusalem bureau, which operates under the watch of the Israel Defense Forces. This raises questions about the independence and neutrality of the news coverage regarding the Gaza conflict.

The Palestinian Journalists’ Syndicate issued a scathing statement condemning the Western media’s bias. They argued that the media discourse surrounding the Gaza conflict represents a new low for journalistic integrity, particularly in the wake of Israel’s genocidal assault.

The Intercept’s analysis extends to both print media and cable news, highlighting how biased coverage affects general perceptions of the Gaza conflict. The report suggests that this bias may contribute to the growing generational divide in perceptions of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, driven by differences in news sources.

In the words of the Palestinian Journalists’ Syndicate, “Even by the low standards set by media coverage of previous massacres in Gaza, the media discourse surrounding recent events represents a new low for the principles of journalistic integrity.”


If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.