US lawmakers’ opposition to genocide case against Israel sparks controversy amid AIPAC’s influence

The letter, sent to U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, reflects the position of a significant number of U.S. lawmakers on the sensitive issue of Israel's actions in Gaza.

Image Credit: Michael Brochstein / SOPA Images/Sipa USA via AP Images

A group of over 60 House Democrats joined 148 Republicans in condemning the genocide case brought by South Africa against the Israeli government at the International Court of Justice (ICJ). The bipartisan effort, seen in the context of the ongoing conflict in Gaza, marks a notable stance in international politics.

The letter, sent to U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken, reflects the position of a significant number of U.S. lawmakers on the sensitive issue of Israel’s actions in Gaza.

Led by Reps. Chris Smith (R-N.J.) and Kathy Manning (D-N.C.), the letter branded South Africa’s case as “grossly unfounded” and conveyed “disgust” at the ICJ filing. The letter, while not refuting the evidence presented by South African attorneys, echoed the Biden administration’s stance on the matter.

This letter has garnered attention not only for its content but also for its bipartisan nature, representing a united front among a significant number of U.S. lawmakers from both major political parties.The American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) backed the letter, a fact noted by Smith’s office. AIPAC, known for its support of Israel’s policies, including the assault on Gaza, has been a top campaign contributor to both Smith and Manning in this election cycle.

In its 84-page filing to the ICJ, South Africa laid out extensive evidence against Israel, while also unequivocally condemning violations of international law by all parties, including actions by Hamas. South Africa’s representatives reiterated this balanced condemnation in their presentations before the United Nations court.

The ICJ filing by South Africa has brought global attention to the ongoing conflict, pushing the international community to scrutinize the actions of all involved parties.

Among the letter’s signatories are notable figures such as Reps. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.), Jared Golden (D-Maine), and Jodey Arrington (R-Texas). The list, posted by The Intercept’s Prem Thakker, includes a mix of Democrats and Republicans, reflecting diverse political affiliations.

Interestingly, the number of Democratic lawmakers who signed the letter is roughly equivalent to those who have previously called for a cease-fire in Gaza.

In contrast to the letter, Reps. Cori Bush (D-Mo.) and Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) have endorsed South Africa’s case, emphasizing the need to protect human rights unconditionally. They have been vocal in their support for a cease-fire and a just resolution to the conflict.

Bush and Tlaib’s stance represents a growing voice within the U.S. Congress advocating for a more balanced approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, stressing the importance of accountability and peace.

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken labeled South Africa’s genocide case against Israel as “meritless” in a recent statement. This declaration came despite his acknowledgment of the acute food insecurity facing 90% of Gaza’s population due to Israel’s blockade and bombardment.

South Africa’s complaint to the ICJ included statements from Israeli leaders such as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant. These statements, along with evidence of Israeli actions in Gaza, form the core of South Africa’s case.

The global reaction to South Africa’s filing varies, with some countries supporting the case, while others, like the U.S., have dismissed it.

The Biden administration has consistently denied the genocide allegations against Israel. U.S. National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby and State Department spokesperson Matt Miller have both dismissed South Africa’s lawsuit as “meritless” and lacking factual basis.

Former U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights official Craig Mokhiber and Institute for Policy Studies fellow Phyllis Bennis argued in a recent column that South Africa’s petition is filled with compelling examples that match criteria for genocide. They cite actions such as killing members of the group and creating life-threatening conditions, documented in South Africa’s ICJ filing.

The controversy surrounding South Africa’s genocide case against Israel at the ICJ reflects ongoing tensions in international politics and human rights advocacy. With the U.S. lawmakers’ letter and the Biden administration’s stance, the debate over Israel’s actions in Gaza and the appropriate international response continues to evolve.

“Our commitment to human rights must remain steadfast and unbiased,” stated Reps. Cori Bush and Rashida Tlaib. “The pursuit of justice and peace requires a willingness to confront difficult truths and engage in open dialogue.”


If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.