Arizona grand jury charges Trump aides and state Republicans in attempt to subvert 2020 Election results

High-profile indictments spotlight a significant legal crackdown on the orchestrated attempt to overturn President Joe Biden's 2020 election victory in Arizona.

Nell Redmond/AP Photo

A grand jury in Arizona has delivered a stark rebuke to electoral interference with the indictment of seven aides to former President Donald Trump and nearly a dozen Republican officials. This decisive legal action addresses a clandestine scheme engineered to keep Trump in power despite his electoral loss to President Joe Biden in 2020. The drama unfolding in the Arizona courts underscores a pivotal moment in American democracy, where the resilience of its electoral integrity is being stringently tested.

Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes, anchoring the state’s legal response, announced the comprehensive 58-page indictment that labels Trump as “unindicted co-conspirator 1.” The indictment meticulously details how these individuals, including key figures from the Arizona Republican Party, allegedly orchestrated a fake elector scheme to falsify the state’s support and declare Trump the winner. Notable among those indicted are former Arizona Republican Party Chair Kelli Ward, state Senators Jake Hoffman and Anthony Kern, and former U.S. Senate candidate Jim Lamon.

The charges levied against the individuals include serious allegations of fraud, forgery, and conspiracy. The indictment narrates a troubling scenario where these figures attempted to pressure election officials and manipulate electoral outcomes blatantly. According to the indictment, these concerted efforts began as early as November 4, 2020, immediately following the election, indicating a premeditated attempt to subvert the voters’ will.

This case not only tests the limits of legal accountability for electoral interference but also sets a precedent for how deep the ramifications of such actions can go. Arizona’s Attorney General underscored the gravity of the situation, stating that the alleged plot “effectively would have made the right to vote meaningless” for Arizonans, by denying them their chosen leader and violating foundational democratic principles.

The legal proceedings have sparked a significant reaction from voting rights advocates who see this indictment as a critical step in defending electoral integrity. Alex Gulotta, Arizona’s state director for All Voting Is Local Action, remarked on the necessity of holding election deniers accountable to restore public confidence in democratic institutions. Similarly, Jenny Guzman from Common Cause Arizona highlighted the relief and approval from community members who are still grappling with the repercussions of the false elector narrative and its broader implications on public trust and electoral security.

The indictment throws a spotlight not just on the individuals involved but also on the political atmosphere that allowed such a scheme to be conceived and nearly implemented. It raises questions about the safeguards currently in place to protect elections from internal threats and the necessary reforms to prevent such occurrences in the future.

“The people of Arizona elected President Biden. Unwilling to accept this fact, the defendants charged by the state grand jury allegedly schemed to prevent the lawful transfer of the presidency,” said Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes. “Whatever their reasoning was, the plot to violate the law must be answered for.”


If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.