Supreme Court justices accepted over $6.5 million in gifts, raising ethics concerns

These findings raise significant questions about judicial ethics and the potential influence of such gifts on the highest court in the land.


A detailed investigation has revealed that U.S. Supreme Court justices have accepted hundreds of gifts worth millions of dollars over the past two decades. The advocacy group Fix the Court has documented 672 gifts valued at $6,592,657 given to 18 current and former justices between January 2004 and December 2023. These findings raise significant questions about judicial ethics and the potential influence of such gifts on the highest court in the land.

Supreme Court justices hold immense power in the U.S. judicial system, making decisions that can impact the entire nation. Given their influential role, maintaining ethical conduct and transparency is paramount. The acceptance of gifts by these justices, however, has cast a shadow over their integrity and impartiality.

Fix the Court, a watchdog organization dedicated to transparency and accountability in the judiciary, conducted an extensive investigation into the gifts received by Supreme Court justices. The data was collected from various sources, including ProPublica, New York Times, L.A. Times, congressional records, annual disclosures, and the organization’s own research.

The investigation focused on gifts reported over a 20-year period, from January 2004 to December 2023. The data includes both confirmed gifts and likely gifts based on available information. The criteria used to identify and value the gifts were thorough, ensuring an accurate representation of the gifts’ worth and their potential impact on judicial conduct.

The investigation uncovered a staggering number of gifts received by Supreme Court justices. In total, 672 gifts valued at $6,592,657 were identified. Justice Clarence Thomas topped the list, receiving 193 gifts valued at over $4 million. These gifts primarily consisted of free trips to Bohemian Grove and Topridge, owned by billionaire Republican megadonor Harlan Crow.

Other justices also received significant gifts:

• The late Justice Antonin Scalia received 67 gifts worth over $210,000.

• Justice Samuel Alito accepted 16 gifts valued at just over $170,000.

• Justice Brett Kavanaugh and former Justice David Souter were at the lower end, each receiving a single gift valued at $100 and $349, respectively.

Some of the notable gifts included yacht trips to Russia, the Greek Isles, and Indonesia for Justice Thomas, and fishing trips for Justices Scalia and Alito. The tally also included a luxury RV gifted to Thomas by Tony Welters, with the amount of principal and interest forgiven estimated at $253,686.

The acceptance of such gifts by Supreme Court justices raises serious ethical concerns. Public servants who earn substantial salaries and have opportunities to earn more through book deals and other ventures can afford to pay for their own vacations, vehicles, and memberships. Accepting these gifts creates potential conflicts of interest and undermines public trust in the judiciary.

The influence of gift-givers on judicial decisions cannot be overlooked. The generosity shown by wealthy donors could be seen as an attempt to sway the justices’ rulings in their favor. This situation underscores the need for stricter gift acceptance rules to ensure that justices remain impartial and free from undue influence.

Fix the Court’s executive director, Gabe Roth, emphasized the need for stricter gift acceptance rules. “Supreme Court justices should not be accepting gifts, let alone the hundreds of freebies worth millions of dollars they’ve received over the years,” Roth stated. He added that the ethics crisis at the Court would not begin to abate until justices adopt stricter gift acceptance rules.

Lawmakers have also expressed concern over the findings. U.S. Senator Jeff Merkley noted on social media that continuous headlines about lavish gifts could erode public trust in the Court. He called for the passage of the Supreme Court Ethics, Recusal, and Transparency Act to enforce a real code of ethics.

Historically, gift acceptance rules for public officials have been stringent to prevent corruption and maintain integrity. Previous scandals have shown that public trust can be severely damaged when officials fail to adhere to ethical standards. The ethical standards in other branches of government and in other countries are often more rigorous, ensuring that officials do not accept gifts that could influence their decisions.

Ahead of the expected release of the justices’ financial disclosure reports, the Supreme Court announced the adoption of a code of conduct last November. However, watchdog groups have criticized this move as insufficient. The need for comprehensive legislative reforms to enforce stricter ethical standards remains pressing.

Advocacy groups and lawmakers are pushing for legislative reforms to address the ethical concerns raised by these findings. The ongoing efforts to pass relevant laws aim to ensure transparency and accountability in the judiciary. Public awareness and engagement are crucial in holding justices accountable and restoring trust in the Supreme Court.

The investigation into the gifts accepted by Supreme Court justices has revealed a troubling pattern of behavior that undermines the integrity of the judiciary. Gabe Roth of Fix the Court stated, “Public servants who make four times the median local salary, and who can make millions writing books on any topic they like, can afford to pay for their own vacations, vehicles, hunting excursions, and club memberships — to say nothing of the influence the gift-givers are buying with their ‘generosity.’” 


If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.

Previous articleSanders and Omar lead congressional push for Global Wealth Tax as Biden faces crucial decision
Next articleWhat did we know
Alexis Sterling is a seasoned War and Human Rights Reporter with a passion for reporting the truth in some of the world's most tumultuous regions. With a background in journalism and a keen interest in international affairs, Alexis's reporting is grounded in a commitment to human rights and a deep understanding of the complexities of global conflicts. Her work seeks to give voice to the voiceless and bring to light the human stories behind the headlines. Alexis is dedicated to responsible and engaged journalism, constantly striving to inform and educate the public on critical issues of war and human rights across the globe.