Supreme Court Backs EPA, Refuses to Block Mercury Emissions Rule

568
SOURCEEcoWatch

A month after issuing a stay on the Clean Power Plan, the Supreme Court rejected a challenge to another one of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) power plant rules this week.

Photo credit: Shutterstock
The Mercury and Air Toxic Standards rule, which tightens restrictions on harmful pollutants that are byproducts of burning coal, was challenged by 20 states, which argue that the regulations are too expensive. Photo credit: Shutterstock

Many see this as a major victory for the Obama administration and an indication that the Clean Power Plan decision was “highly extraordinary.” Obama administration officials praised the court’s decision and EPA spokeswoman Melissa Harrison said the agency was “very pleased.”

The Mercury and Air Toxic Standards rule, which tightens restrictions on harmful pollutants that are byproducts of burning coal, was challenged by 20 states, which argue that the regulations are too expensive. The EPA will issue an economic analysis of the rule in April, but power plants must begin compliance measures now, thanks to the ruling. 

For a deeper dive: New York Times, Washington Post, Wall Street JournalReuters, Atlantic, The Hill, Think Progress, GreenWire

Get NationofChange in your inbox

Independent reporting every weekday. No paywall, no advertisers, no corporate owner. Free, and you can unsubscribe whenever you like.

Subscribe free

Your gift is being matched, up to $2,000.

A member of the NationofChange board is matching every contribution to our summer drive, dollar for dollar, until the $2,000 is used up or the drive ends on 24 August. We take no advertising money and answer to no corporate owner. The article you just read was paid for by readers, and right now what they give counts twice.

FALL FUNDRAISER

If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.

[give_form id="735829"]

COMMENTS