Kochs’ Americans for Prosperity group launches campaign to crush fuel economy standards

Through social media feeds of the many AFP state chapters, the group is promoting a petition to “Repeal Costly Obama-era Fuel Standards.”

Image credit: Truthout.org/Flickr

Americans For Prosperity (AFP), a political advocacy network funded by the petrochemical billionaire Koch brothers, recently launched a campaign to support President Donald Trump’s efforts to roll back fuel efficiency and automobile emissions standards.

Through social media feeds of the many AFP state chapters, the group is promoting a petition to “Repeal Costly Obama-era Fuel Standards.”

The Trump administration has proposed ending costly Obama-era fuel economy rules. This move will save money AND lives,” urged one Tweet from AFP’s national account. State chapters echoed variations of that theme.

The petition, which has been active for at least one week, currently has accumulated 180 signatures.

Without linking or referencing any specific studies or resources, the petition claims that repealing these standards will both save lives and make vehicles cheaper.

“The [U.S. Environmental Protection Agency] EPA and [National Highway Traffic Safety Administration] NHTSA have proposed a new rule that would amend costly Obama-era fuel economy standards, saving American consumers thousands of dollars on vehicles.

According to the EPA, amending these regulations will save consumers more than $2,300 in overall average ownership costs for a new vehicle. On top of that, it is expected that these reforms will save 1,000 lives per year by making it easier for Americans to afford safer, newer vehicles.

Sign this letter in support of this proposed rule change, and tell the federal government to put American consumers first!”

The group doesn’t cite sources, because the figures are cherry-picked and misleading.

In fact, according to the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ACEEE), the rollbacks proposed by Trump’s agencies would cost the average consumer more than $1,600 in total ownership costs over the life of the vehicle, even when factoring in any increased purchase costs. The Obama-era standards will save drivers so much in gasoline, they more than offset the costs that manufacturers might pass along to buyers.

As for the safety argument, a study released last year examining vehicle weight and traffic fatalities proved exactly the opposite of what the Trump EPA and the Americans for Prosperity petition claim. Instead, stronger fuel efficiency standards should reduce traffic fatalities.

What the paper shows is that even if those environmental benefits are very, very low, if nothing else, from a safety reason, you have a reason to move forward with the standards,” Antonio Bento, an environmental economics expert at the University of Southern California and one of the study’s co-authors, told the Washington Post at the time.



If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.

Previous articleThe two party food fight
Next articleProgressive Briefing for Wednesday, October 10
Ben Jervey has been covering and working in the climate, energy, and environmental fields for a decade. He is regular contributor to DeSmogBlog. He was the original Environment Editor for GOOD Magazine, and wrote a longstanding weekly column titled “The New Ideal: Building the clean energy economy of the 21st Century and avoiding the worst fates of climate change.” He also contributes to National Geographic News, Grist, OnEarth Magazine, and many other online and print publications. His book–The Big Green Apple: Your Guide to Eco-Friendly Living in New York City–has been called the “bible of green living for NYC.” A bicycle enthusiast, Ben has ridden across the United States and through much of Europe.