US media must scrutinize Biden presidency – not celebrate it – if they want to retain credibility

Journalists and those who hold their purse-strings will have to find a new enemy if they wish to keep their increased ratings – and maybe even their reputation of being a critical eye – intact when Biden becomes president in January.

137
SOURCEThe Conversation

As in much of the developed world, the U.S. media is in an existential crisis. For more than a decade, dwindling advertising revenue and threats to the authority and legitimacy exacerbated by the rise of digital and social platforms is putting relentless pressure on mainstream news organizations. As president, Donald Trump has provided them not just with opportunities to raise their ratings, but he has given them something to talk about. Every day.

Trump’s battle with the press – according to him “the enemy of the people” – has also given journalists a chance to reassert their power and, more importantly, their presence. Just as former CBS chief executive Les Moonves said in 2016: “Trump may not be good for America, but he is damn good for CBS”.

So now that it looks all but inevitable that Trump will have to leave the White House in January 2021, we need to start considering how the media will begin to cover a Biden presidency.

Biden has had a relatively good experience with journalists in the past. It helped he was under the umbrella of the 44th U.S. president, Barack Obama – a darling of the media who was left largely unscathed by press attacks during his campaign and subsequent two terms in the White House. Reporters did, however, pick up on a few, small Biden gaffes, such as the time he was caught on camera telling Obama in 2010 that the signing into law of healthcare reform was “a big fucking deal”. That’s certainly not as bad as when the then vice president Dick Cheney was overheard on the floor of the US Senate to tell Senator Patrick Leahy to “Go fuck yourself” in a debate about judicial nominations and Cheney’s ties to war-profiteering Halliburton.

There were a few other Biden gaffes during the recent campaign. His hypothetical reference to what would have happened had Barack Obama been assassinated during the 2008 campaign, for example, which was widely seen as a misstep or an occasion on which he confused Nevada and New Hampshire during the most recent campaign.

But we should put Biden’s gaffes at least in some context, the least of which is that his speech hasn’t led to major international political crises or ramped-up racial tensions in the U.S. He hasn’t encouraged people to inject dangerous chemicals to cure themselves of COVID. Trump did say these things – and plenty more.

Age-old questions

How, then, will journalists handle Biden in office? For a start the media will need to tread lightly on the issue of Biden’s age – he turns 78 on November 20, making the oldest man to take on the presidency – so as to not appear ageist. But there are other, uglier tropes which have trended on social media, for example the tag: “Creepy Uncle Joe” for his supposedly inappropriate behavior with women. At a time when personality politics remains so dominant in public discourse, this sort of thing won’t make for an easy transition.

Prominent commentator Jack Shafer writing in Politico has observed that, over the years, “media’s biggest favor to Biden was to ignore him”. So how journalism responds to Biden now will be key to the continuing credibility of the US news media. This is doubly important thanks to Trump’s own behavior, policies and speech while in office. The feeling is that journalism needs to strain every sinew to reinforce its role as a legitimate and authoritative truth-teller.

Coming after Trump, who elite U.S. journalists have largely found distasteful, will Biden be a new media star who gives journalists “good stories” to tell, who provides opportunities for expert opinion, analysis and heated debate, and whose Twitter feed can fuel the next news cycle? And, if Biden is “good for democracy,” how will journalists cover – as opposed to celebrate – someone that half of the country voted against?

Uninteresting times?

I’ve written before that reducing a focus on Trump might provide journalists with a chance to focus on other issues elsewhere, ditching the distraction of the daily White House carnival for deeper and more serious reporting projects. But will a political sphere without Trump altogether mean journalism is back to being boring?

Many will argue that Trump’s policies were so divisive and dangerous that anyone in the office other than him is necessarily positive. But journalists and those who hold their purse-strings will have to find a new enemy if they wish to keep their increased ratings – and maybe even their reputation of being a critical eye – intact when Biden becomes president in January.

History suggests that conflict attracts more eyeballs than stable government. So there are urgent questions for the media in this new era. Trump’s outspoken opposition to what he called the “fake news media” offered news organizations a sense of legitimacy and relevancy (in most people’s eyes in any case). This will suffer if they don’t subject Biden to the same level of scrutiny.

Robert E Gutsche Jr, Senior Lecturer in Critical Digital Media Practice, Lancaster University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

FALL FUNDRAISER

If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.

Fall 2019

$
Select Payment Method
Personal Info

Credit Card Info
This is a secure SSL encrypted payment.

Donation Total: $5.00 One Time

SHARE
Previous articleClimate change will make parts of the US uninhabitable. Americans are still moving there.
Next articleWill the Biden team be warmongers or peacemakers?
Robert E Gutsche Jr
My research examines issues of power in the application of news myth to perpetuate and secure racialized explanations of perceived social disorder. I am also interested in how journalists form collective boundaries and this assists in news as an ideological tool of and for dominant ideology. In this work, I blend participatory and ethnographic approaches with qualitative textual and discourse analysis to examine news practices and texts through critical and cultural lenses. Within the field of journalism studies, therefore, my research agenda holds three aims: 1) to examine the role of journalists within an ideological, interpretive community – particularly in terms of expressing narratives of race and geography; 2) to explore issues of power within journalistic storytelling via mythical news narratives that reinforce dominant ideologies of community; and, 3) to apply critical human geography to explicate place-making in local news as an ideological process. I have presented more than 100 papers at international conferences and have published in scholarly journals that include Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, Journalism: Theory, Practice, and Criticism, Journalism Studies, and Visual Communication. I am also an Associate Editor for Journalism Practice. My authored books include A Transplanted Chicago: Race, Place and the Press in Iowa City (McFarland, 2014), Media Control: News as an Institution of Power and Social Control (Bloomsbury, 2015/2017), News, Neoliberalism and Miami’s Fragmented Urban Space (coauthor with Moses Shumow, Lexington, 2016), Trumpled: The Making of Trump and the Demonization of the Press (Bloomsbury, due to publisher in 2018), Reinventing Journalism, Education, and Training: Addressing News as Power and Propaganda (Bloomsbury, due to publisher 2018), and Geographies of Journalism: The Imaginative Power of Place in Making Digital News (coauthor with Kristy Hess, Routledge, due to publisher in 2018). I am coeditor of Visual Culture for a Global Audience (with Alina Rafikova, Cognella, 2016), and am editor of The Trump Presidency, Journalism, and Democracy (Routledge, 2018). Before arriving at Lancaster, I was assistant professor in Journalism + Media at Florida International University in Miami where I led the department’s Mobile Virtual Reality Lab and was Co-PI of FIU’s $300,000 Inter-disciplinary Educational E-immersive Production Studio. In 2015, I was a Research Scholar at the Donald W. Reynolds Journalism Institute at the University of Missouri to study audience interactions with longform, multimedia journalism, and in 2017 was named a Disruptive Educator at City University of New York’s Tow-Knight Center for Entrepreneurial Journalism. I also have written as a journalist for The Washington Post, Chicago Tribune, Newsday, Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, Wisconsin State Journal, and other regional and local publications. In 2009, I helped launch an online nonprofit news organization at the University of Wisconsin-Madison and cofounded another online nonprofit news outlet that same year at the University of Iowa.

COMMENTS