US Court of Appeals rules against Arctic offshore oil drilling project, protects polar bears

A lawsuit challenged the Trump administration's approval of Arctic offshore drilling claiming it violated federal law and ignored climate change.


In a Dec. 7 ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled against the Trump administration’s approval of off-shore drilling in the Arctic. The protects Beaufort Sea and the polar bears and Arctic communities within.

Hilcorp Alaska received approval to “build and operate the controversial Liberty project, an artificial drilling island and underwater pipeline” in 2018. The Liberty project was going to include the construction of a nine-acre artificial island, where drilling operations would take place with a 24-acre footprint with a 5.6 mile pipeline extending in 20 feet of water to onshore pipelines, according to the Center for Biological Diversity.

A lawsuit brought on by the Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, Defenders of Wildlife and Pacific Environment, and represented by Earthjustice, challenged the administration’s approval claiming it violated federal law and ignored climate change.

“Today’s news is a victory for Alaska’s imperiled polar bears that are threatened by oil and gas development throughout virtually all of their terrestrial denning critical habitat─in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, National Petroleum Reserve-Alaska, and in the nearshore marine environment as well,” Nicole Whittington-Evans, Alaska program director at Defenders of Wildlife, said. “Defenders will continue our fight against destructive oil and gas drilling and for the survival of polar bears in the Arctic.”

The court ruled that the “Trump administration had failed to properly consider the climate impacts of the project, as required by the National Environmental Policy Act,” according to the Center for Biological Diversity. It also said that the Fish and Wildlife Service violated the Endangered Species Act by not considering the project’s effects on polar bears, “specifically, that the agency arbitrarily relied on uncertain mitigation measures in concluding the project would not adversely modify polar bear critical habitat and failed to properly consider the harm to them from noise disturbance.”

“We applaud the court’s decision to reject the Trump administration’s rush to drill for oil in Alaska’s pristine Arctic coastlines,” Marcie Keever, legal director with Friends of the Earth, said. “Thankfully, the court put the health of our children and our planet over oil company profits. We will continue to fight against future oil and gas projects in the Arctic.”


If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.