Pharma ‘myth’ debunked as study shows US public poured $32 billion into mRNA vaccines

"Without public investment, there would be no mRNA vaccines."

SOURCECommon Dreams
Image Credit: Lisa Ferdinando

Vaccine equity campaigners said Thursday that a new peer-reviewed study published in a major medical journal should put to rest the pharmaceutical industry’s “false narrative” that its own investments were responsible for the rapid development of mRNA vaccines to fight the coronavirus pandemic.

The study, published in The BMJ on Wednesday, estimates that the U.S. federal government has invested at least $31.9 billion in the development, production, and purchase of mRNA coronavirus vaccines—a finding that the People’s Vaccine Alliance said undercuts pharmaceutical companies’ attempts to take credit for the innovations that made the lifesaving shots possible.

“Pharmaceutical companies have sold a false narrative to the public; that it was their investment which gave us mRNA vaccines and that they deserve the $75 billion profit made from COVID-19 vaccines. As this research shows, that claim is a total myth,” Mohga Kamal-Yanni, policy co-lead for the People’s Vaccine Alliance, said in a statement Thursday.

“Without public investment, there would be no mRNA vaccines. Yet just three pharmaceutical companies have been handed monopolies on this lifesaving public science,” Kamal-Yanni continued. “These are the people’s vaccines, and the technology behind them should be shared with the world.”

The new study, which tracks U.S. public investments in mRNA vaccine technology dating back decades, identifies 34 National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded research grants that were “directly related to mRNA COVID-19 vaccines.”

The authors summarized their findings:

Pre-pandemic, the NIH invested $116 million (35 percent) in basic and translational science related to mRNA vaccine technology, and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) ($148 million; 44 percent) and the Department of Defense ($72 million; 21 percent) invested in vaccine development. After the pandemic started, $29.2 billion (92 percent) of U.S. public funds purchased vaccines, $2.2 billion (7 percent) supported clinical trials, and $108 million (<1 percent) supported manufacturing plus basic and translational science…

These public investments translated into millions of lives saved and were crucial in developing the mRNA vaccine technology that also has the potential to tackle future pandemics and to treat diseases beyond Covid-19. To maximize overall health impact, policymakers should ensure equitable global access to publicly funded health technologies.

Though their successes were enabled at every step by government support, pharmaceutical companies—including Moderna and Pfizer, the manufacturers of the two available mRNA Covid-19 vaccines—have resisted the notion that federal research and funding was critical to the rapid development of coronavirus shots.

Speaking to Barron’s in July 2020, before any coronavirus vaccines had received emergency authorization, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla scoffed at the notion that pharmaceutical companies should forgo any profits from coronavirus vaccines and therapeutics.

“I think it’s very wrong. You need to be very fanatic and radical to say something like that right now,” Bourla said. “Who is finding the solution? The private sector found the solution for diagnostics, and the private sector found the solution for therapeutics and is along [the] way to find more solutions for therapeutics and vaccines.”

Pfizer posted $31.4 billion in profits in 2022, a sum advocates condemned as “sickening”—particularly as many people in low-income countries still lack access to coronavirus vaccines.

While Moderna’s billionaire CEO Stéphane Bancel has acknowledged that “we didn’t do this alone” and that government financial backing played an important role in the development of COVID-19 vaccines, the company is fighting with the NIH over patent rights to spike-protein technology that is central to the mRNA shots.

The New York Times reported last month that Moderna recently agreed to make a $400 million payment for using a chemical technique that was developed with government funding. The payment will be shared by the NIH and two U.S. universities involved in the invention of the technique.

But the Times noted that “Moderna is still locked in a separate high-stakes dispute with the NIH over who invented the central component of the vaccine, the genetic sequence that helps recipients produce an immune response.”

Peter Maybarduk, director of the Access to Medicines program at Public Citizen, said in response to Moderna’s $400 million payment that it “amounts to little more than 1 percent of its $36 billion in global sales.”

“Considering Moderna’s soup-to-nuts reliance on U.S. government support, the public deserves a much better deal, including vaccines made available free or at cost today,” said Maybarduk. “The government should have insisted on affordability from the start, and should insist on essentially free vaccines today. There would be no NIH-Moderna vaccine without the NIH.”

The People’s Vaccine Alliance and Oxfam International echoed that sentiment in a statement earlier this week as a World Health Organization body kicked off negotiations over an international pandemic accord.

“Medical technologies related to pathogens with pandemic potential must be treated as global common goods—be available to all who need them at the same time,” the groups said. “Global common goods must take precedence over private commercial interests.”


If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.