In the crosshairs: The perilous reality for journalists in 2023

Examining the heightened risks faced by journalists in conflict zones, especially in the Gaza Strip, amidst global political tensions and criticism of U.S. foreign policy.


In a year of global change, our independent journalism matters. Join our end-of-year drive; your support keeps our quality news coming.

In a year marked by heightened global tensions, the plight of journalists in conflict zones has come sharply into focus. U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s recent remarks about the dangerous conditions faced by the press in 2023 have stirred controversy. His comments on social media drew criticism for failing to acknowledge the significant number of journalists killed in the ongoing Israel-Gaza conflict, a situation intensified by U.S. military support to Israel.

Blinken’s statement encapsulates a grim reality: journalists worldwide are increasingly finding themselves in perilous situations. From being targeted in conflict zones to facing imprisonment and threats, the risks to those who strive to keep the public informed are escalating. This trend is not isolated to any one region but is a disturbing global phenomenon, challenging the very foundations of free press.

In various parts of the world, journalists are routinely confronted with violence, legal harassment, and censorship. Whether covering political unrest, environmental issues, or corruption, the dangers are real and growing. The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) and other watchdogs continuously report on these threats, highlighting a worrying decline in press freedoms globally.

The Israel-Gaza conflict has been particularly devastating for journalists. According to the CPJ, the conflict has resulted in a staggering number of media worker casualties. The latest data reveals a grim tally: 69 journalists and media workers killed—62 Palestinians, four Israelis, and three Lebanese. These figures reflect the perils faced by those covering this fraught and complex conflict.

The situation in Gaza is especially dire. Journalists there are navigating not only the physical dangers of warfare but also the challenges of disrupted communications and limited resources. The deaths of these journalists underscore the extreme risks involved in reporting from such volatile environments.

The U.S. government’s role in the conflict, particularly its military aid to Israel, has come under scrutiny. Critics argue that the U.S.’s “unwavering” support and substantial aid package have contributed to the dangers faced by journalists in the region. This stance has led to pointed questions about the ethical implications of such support amidst rising journalist casualties.

The debate intensifies when considering the U.S.’s position in international forums. Despite widespread calls for a cease-fire, the U.S. has exercised its veto power in the U.N. Security Council, shaping the course of the conflict and, by extension, the safety of journalists on the ground.

Blinken’s statement has not gone unchallenged in the media. Journalists and commentators have been vocal in their criticism, questioning the sincerity and timing of his acknowledgment of the risks to the press. Mehdi Hasan, Ryan Grim, and Jeremy Scahill, among others, have highlighted the inconsistency in advocating for press safety while supporting policies that arguably exacerbate these dangers.

Their responses reflect a broader discontent within the media community. The issue goes beyond mere rhetoric; it touches on the tangible support and protections afforded to journalists in conflict zones. The critical reactions to Blinken’s statement underscore the need for a more comprehensive approach to ensuring the safety of the press.

The U.N. has been a pivotal arena for addressing the Gaza conflict, with the Security Council passing resolutions aimed at mitigating the situation. However, the U.S. has often found itself at odds with the international community on this issue. Its abstention from a recent Gaza resolution, following a history of vetoes, has been seen as indicative of its stance.

Public opinion in the U.S. appears to diverge from the administration’s actions. Polls suggest that a majority of American voters favor a cease-fire, aligning more closely with international sentiments than with their government’s approach. This discrepancy highlights the complexities of foreign policy and its impact on international conflicts.

The Assange case represents another dimension of the press freedom debate. The ongoing efforts to extradite the WikiLeaks founder to the U.S. have sparked concerns about the implications for journalism and whistleblowing. Assange faces potentially severe penalties for publishing classified information that brought to light various war crimes and abuses.

Reporters Without Borders has warned of the precedent Assange’s case could set. The fear is that his prosecution under the Espionage Act could open the door to similar actions against other publishers and journalists, chilling investigative journalism and the public’s right to know.

The CPJ-compiled list of journalist casualties in the Israel-Gaza war paints a stark picture. The list includes names, nationalities, and circumstances of the deaths, injuries, and disappearances of journalists caught in the conflict. It serves as a sobering reminder of the high price paid by those reporting from war zones.

The list includes journalists from a range of nationalities and affiliations, each with their own story. These journalists were engaged in the vital task of reporting on the war, often at great personal risk. Their losses are not just personal tragedies but also significant blows to the global journalistic community:


December 19, 2023

  • Adel Zorob

December 18, 2023

  • Abdallah Alwan

December 17, 2023

  • Assem Kamal Moussa
  • Haneen Kashtan

December 15, 2023

  • Samer Abu Daqqa

December 9, 2023

  • Duaa Jabbour
  • Ola Atallah

December 3, 2023

  • Hassan Farajallah
  • Shaima El-Gazzar

December 1, 2023

  • Abdullah Darwish
  • Montaser Al-Sawaf
  • Adham Hassouna

November 24, 2023

  • Mostafa Bakeer

November 23, 2023

  • Mohamed Mouin Ayyash

November 22, 2023

  • Mohamed Nabil Al-Zaq

November 21, 2023

  • Farah Omar
  • Rabih Al Maamari

November 20, 2023

  • Ayat Khadoura

November 19, 2023

  • Bilal Jadallah

November 18, 2023

  • Abdelhalim Awad
  • Sari Mansour
  • Hassouneh Salim
  • Mostafa El Sawaf
  • Amro Salah Abu Hayah
  • Mossab Ashour

November 13, 2023

  • Ahmed Fatima
  • Yaacoub Al-Barsh

November 10, 2023

  • Ahmed Al-Qara

November 7, 2023

  • Yahya Abu Manih
  • Mohamed Abu Hassira

November 5, 2023

  • Mohamed Al Jaja

November 2, 2023

  • Mohamad Al-Bayyari
  • Mohammed Abu Hatab

November 1, 2023

  • Majd Fadl Arandas
  • Iyad Matar

October 31, 2023

  • Imad Al-Wahidi
  • Majed Kashko

October 30, 2023

  • Nazmi Al-Nadim

October 27, 2023

  • Yasser Abu Namous

October 26, 2023

  • Duaa Sharaf

October 25, 2023

  • Jamal Al-Faqaawi
  • Saed Al-Halabi
  • Ahmed Abu Mhadi
  • Salma Mkhaimer

October 23, 2023

  • Mohammed Imad Labad

October 22, 2023

  • Roshdi Sarraj

October 20, 2023

  • Roee Idan
  • Mohammed Ali

October 19, 2023

  • Khalil Abu Aathra

October 18, 2023

  • Sameeh Al-Nady

October 17, 2023

  • Mohammad Balousha
  • Issam Bhar

October 16, 2023

  • Abdulhadi Habib

October 14, 2023

  • Yousef Maher Dawas

October 13, 2023

  • Salam Mema
  • Husam Mubarak
  • Issam Abdallah

October 12, 2023

  • Ahmed Shehab

October 11, 2023

  • Mohamed Fayez Abu Matar

October 10, 2023

  • Saeed al-Taweel
  • Mohammed Sobh
  • Hisham Alnwajha

October 8, 2023

  • Assaad Shamlakh

October 7, 2023

  • Shai Regev
  • Ayelet Arnin
  • Yaniv Zohar
  • Mohammad Al-Salhi
  • Mohammad Jarghoun
  • Ibrahim Mohammad Lafi


December 19, 2023

  • Islam Bader
  • Mohamed Ahmed

December 16, 2023

  • Mohamed Balousha

December 15, 2023

  • Wael Al Dahdouh
  • Mustafa Alkharouf

November 18, 2023

  • Mohammed El Sawwaf
  • Montaser El Sawaf

November 13, 2023

  • Issam Mawassi

October 13, 2023

  • Thaer Al-Sudani
  • Maher Nazeh
  • Elie Brakhya
  • Carmen Joukhadar
  • Christina Assi
  • Dylan Collins

The year 2023 has emerged as a particularly dangerous one for journalists, with conflict zones like Gaza representing the sharp end of the risk spectrum. Blinken’s remarks, while acknowledging these dangers, have drawn criticism for failing to address the full scope of the challenges faced by the press, particularly in light of U.S. foreign policy. As the world navigates these tumultuous times, the safety and freedom of the press remain crucial barometers of global peace and democracy.

Sherif Mansour, CPJ’s Middle East and North Africa program coordinator, poignantly captures the essence of the situation: “Journalists across the region are making great sacrifices to cover this heart-breaking conflict. Those in Gaza, in particular, have paid, and continue to pay, an unprecedented toll and face exponential threats. Many have lost colleagues, families, and media facilities, and have fled seeking safety when there is no safe haven or exit.”


If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.