Surging arms trade amid global tensions: The booming business of war

Exploring the dramatic rise in global arms orders and the consequential ethical and economic impacts, amidst escalating geopolitical tensions.

320
SOURCENationofChange

Our team delivered vital news this year. As an independent outlet, we count on your support. Please donate to our year-end fundraising.

The global arms trade is witnessing a significant surge, as reported by the Financial Times in a recent analysis. The study reveals that orders at many of the world’s biggest arms companies are reaching “near record highs,” driven by increasing geopolitical tensions in recent years. As of the end of 2022, the combined backlogs of the world’s 15 top arms makers stood at an astonishing $777.6 billion, marking a 10% increase from 2020.

The upward trend in arms orders has shown no signs of slowing down. The first six months of 2023 saw these companies’ combined backlogs at approximately $764 billion. This continued rise indicates a swelling pipeline of work for these firms, as governments globally maintain or increase their defense orders. The figures from the Financial Times paint a clear picture of the growing demand for military hardware in an increasingly uncertain global landscape.

This trend’s persistence into 2023 underscores the long-term impact of geopolitical instability on the arms industry. The sustained growth in orders reflects the ongoing adjustments of national defense strategies in response to evolving global threats and conflicts.

Investor interest in the defense sector has spiked significantly alongside the increase in arms orders. Industry benchmarks have recorded notable gains, with MSCI’s global benchmark for defense stocks rising by 25% over the past 12 months. In a similar vein, Europe’s Stoxx aerospace and defense stocks index has surged by more than 50% in the same period. These figures reflect a growing investor conviction that defense spending by governments will remain elevated.

The robust performance of these market indices highlights the financial sector’s growing confidence in the defense industry’s prospects. As geopolitical tensions continue to shape global dynamics, the defense sector appears increasingly attractive to investors seeking profitable opportunities.

Prominent private equity firms, including BlackRock, Vanguard, Capital Group, and State Street, have emerged as dominant or major shareholders in many of the weapons companies analyzed. The International Schiller Institute, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank, criticizes these Wall Street speculators for perpetuating wars to sustain their financial system. According to the institute, these firms are integral to the ongoing cycle of global conflicts.

These private equity giants hold substantial stakes in the defense industry, indicating their significant influence over the direction and scale of global arms trade. Their involvement raises critical questions about the interplay between private capital and international security dynamics.

Geopolitical tensions, particularly the conflict in Ukraine, have played a substantial role in the recent surge in arms orders. South Korea’s Hanwha Aerospace, for instance, saw its order backlog skyrocket from $2.4 billion in 2020 to $15.2 billion at the end of last year. Much of this increase is attributed to sales of K-9 self-propelled howitzers to countries supplying arms to Ukraine.

Similarly, German firm Rheinmetall, known for its Panther main battle tanks, almost doubled its backlog from $14.8 billion to $27.9 billion, largely due to Ukraine-related sales. These examples highlight the direct impact of regional conflicts on the global arms market, with companies rapidly expanding their order books in response to escalating military needs.

The defense budget in the United States has reached $858 billion in 2023, with projections suggesting a trend towards $1 trillion per year. This massive allocation to defense contrasts sharply with the country’s crumbling infrastructure and underfunded public services. The International Schiller Institute highlights this disparity, pointing out the urgent need for investment in critical domestic sectors like highways, railroads, bridges, tunnels, hospitals, and schools.

This situation reflects a broader global challenge, where military expenditures often eclipse critical investments in social and economic development. The ethical implications of such disproportionate spending on arms in a world grappling with myriad social issues are increasingly coming to the fore.

Israel’s assault on Gaza, which began in October, though not included in the Financial Times’ analysis, is expected to further boost arms sales. The conflict, one of the most devastating in modern history, is likely a significant contributor to the record backlogs projected for 2023 and beyond. The daily bombardment of the densely populated Gaza Strip has further fueled the demand for military hardware.

As per a report by Common Dreams, global military spending rose to a record high of over $2.2 trillion last year. This spike in spending, as noted by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, is partially driven by European governments arming Ukraine, showcasing the ripple effect of regional conflicts on global defense expenditure.

Despite an influx of new orders, many European and U.S. defense companies have faced challenges in scaling up production. Persistent supply chain disruptions and labor shortages have hindered their ability to meet the soaring demand. According to an analysis by Sipri, revenues from sales of arms and military services totaled $597 billion in 2022, a 3.5% decrease in real terms from 2021, even as demand for military hardware sharply increased.

Nick Cunningham, an analyst at the insurance firm Agency Partners, suggests a robust future for the industry. He expects the “book to bill ratio” to remain above one, indicating that backlogs are likely to continue growing. This prediction reflects the ongoing buoyancy of the defense sector despite production challenges.

The arms trade’s dramatic expansion amid mounting global tensions is a stark reminder of the complex interplay between geopolitics, economics, and ethics. The defense industry’s booming business, fueled by increasing geopolitical instability, raises critical questions about global priorities and the allocation of resources. As nations grapple with diverse challenges, the continued surge in military spending underscores the need for a balanced approach to national security and global stability.

The escalating global arms trade, underscored by rising geopolitical tensions and regional conflicts, paints a complex picture of the current international landscape. The Financial Times’ analysis revealing a staggering increase in defense orders to a combined backlog of $777.6 billion at the end of 2022 reflects this trend. As Nick Cunningham of Agency Partners notes, “The reality is lead times for policymaking, budgets, and placing orders are so long that the invasion of almost two years ago is only just appearing in orders and barely in revenues, except for a few shorter-cycle specialists such as Rheinmetall.”

FALL FUNDRAISER

If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.

COMMENTS