Unmasking the shadows: The fight to end billionaire tax breaks for dark money

A groundbreaking legislative effort aims to seal a critical loophole in the tax code, curbing the unchecked flow of billionaire-funded dark money into American politics.


In a significant move to address the influence of dark money in American politics, Democratic lawmakers Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse and Rep. Judy Chu have introduced the End Tax Breaks for Dark Money Act. This legislation targets a loophole in the tax code that has allowed billionaires to funnel large sums of money into political advocacy groups without paying capital gains taxes, effectively subsidizing political influence with taxpayer money.

The bill emerges in the wake of revelations about the scale of dark money donations, particularly highlighted by a $1.6 billion donation from billionaire Barre Seid to the Marble Freedom Trust. This donation, one of the largest to a political advocacy group in U.S. history, was made without paying any taxes, shedding light on the urgency for legislative reform.

Under the current tax code, individuals can donate appreciated assets, like stocks, to 501(c)(4) organizations—groups that can engage in political activities without their primary purpose being politics—and avoid paying taxes on the capital gains. This loophole has enabled substantial amounts of money to flow into the political system anonymously, raising concerns about the influence of wealth on democratic processes.

The case of Barre Seid, who transferred his ownership stake in Tripp Lite worth $1.6 billion to a dark money group, underscores the extent to which individuals can exploit this loophole. According to reports, this maneuver allowed Seid to bypass up to $400 million in taxes, fueling the call for legislative action.

In response to these concerns, the End Tax Breaks for Dark Money Act proposes to amend the tax code to treat donations of appreciated assets to 501(c)(4) organizations the same as those made to political action committees (PACs) and parties, subjecting them to capital gains taxes. Sen. Whitehouse stated, “It’s a clear sign of a broken tax code when a single donor can transfer assets worth $1.6 billion to a dark money political group without paying a penny in taxes.”

Rep. Judy Chu echoed this sentiment, emphasizing the need to curb the outsized influence of billionaires on politics. “We can decrease the impact the wealthy have on our politics by applying capital gains taxes to donations of appreciated property to nonprofits that engage in lobbying and political activity,” Chu said.

The infusion of dark money into politics has been a growing concern, especially following the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision in 2010, which allowed for unlimited political spending by corporations and unions. Critics argue that this has led to an environment where policy and elections can be unduly influenced by a small number of wealthy individuals and groups.

Organizations like OpenSecrets have reported a significant increase in spending by super PACs and dark money groups in recent election cycles, further illustrating the pervasive nature of this issue in the political landscape.

While the End Tax Breaks for Dark Money Act is currently supported by Democratic lawmakers, the issue of dark money in politics spans the political spectrum. Efforts to ensure transparency and fairness in political financing have garnered attention from various quarters, suggesting a broader consensus on the need for reform.

However, the bill also faces skepticism from those concerned about the implications for free speech and political participation, arguing that such measures may infringe upon individuals’ rights to support causes they believe in.

The legislation has received endorsements from numerous advocacy groups and organizations committed to campaign finance reform. Common Cause, the Patriotic Millionaires, and the Economic Policy Institute are among those voicing support for the bill, highlighting its potential to level the playing field in political discourse.

Conversely, some critics argue that the bill could complicate legitimate philanthropic efforts and political advocacy, emphasizing the need for a careful balance between transparency and freedom.

As the End Tax Breaks for Dark Money Act makes its way through Congress, its proponents and detractors alike are closely watching its progress. The outcome of this legislative effort could have far-reaching implications for the future of campaign finance and the role of money in American politics.

The introduction of the End Tax Breaks for Dark Money Act marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over the influence of money in politics. By addressing the tax loophole that has facilitated the rise of dark money, lawmakers aim to restore a measure of transparency and equity to the political process.

Sen. Whitehouse summed up the sentiment driving the legislation: “Billionaires attempting to influence politics from the shadows should not be rewarded with taxpayer subsidies.”


If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.

Previous articleBreaking the chain: Tlaib’s crusade against congressional war profiteering
Next articleFull speed ahead on the global Titanic
Alexis Sterling is a seasoned War and Human Rights Reporter with a passion for reporting the truth in some of the world's most tumultuous regions. With a background in journalism and a keen interest in international affairs, Alexis's reporting is grounded in a commitment to human rights and a deep understanding of the complexities of global conflicts. Her work seeks to give voice to the voiceless and bring to light the human stories behind the headlines. Alexis is dedicated to responsible and engaged journalism, constantly striving to inform and educate the public on critical issues of war and human rights across the globe.