2024 election cycle shattered by record Dark Money surge

An unprecedented surge of dark money casts a shadow over the 2024 elections, challenging the transparency and integrity of American democracy with over $162 million in undisclosed contributions.


The 2024 U.S. election cycle is witnessing a staggering influx of ‘dark money,’ setting new precedents for financial contributions from undisclosed sources. A comprehensive analysis conducted by OpenSecrets has highlighted the extent to which shell companies and dark money groups are influencing the political landscape, potentially surpassing previous records.

In 2023 alone, these opaque entities have injected over $162 million into various political groups, notably super PACs, significantly exceeding the levels of dark contributions recorded at comparable stages in prior election cycles. This surge is part of a broader trend that has been unfolding since the Supreme Court’s landmark Citizens United v. FEC decision in 2010, which has tracked more than $2.8 billion in dark money spending and contributions.

Federal campaign finance laws mandate political committees, including super PACs, to disclose their donors to the FEC. However, the origins of these funds can be effectively obscured through contributions from shell companies or dark money groups, such as 501(c)(4) nonprofits, which are not required to disclose their donors. This lack of transparency has raised concerns about the potential for undue influence on the electoral process and policymaking.

The 2022 election cycle saw federal political committees reporting a record $616.8 million in contributions from such sources, marking an all-time high for a midterm cycle. The current trajectory suggests that the 2024 elections could witness even greater amounts of dark money, potentially exceeding the approximately $660 million in contributions from unknown sources that characterized the 2020 elections, which saw over $1 billion in total dark money when including political ad spending.

Interestingly, the distribution of dark money contributions appears to be skewing in favor of Democratic-affiliated committees, with reports indicating about $85 million in political contributions from dark money groups and shell companies to date, compared to approximately $74 million reported by committees supporting Republicans. This trend, which began during the 2018 midterm cycle, contradicts the narrative that one political party benefits more from such contributions, despite ongoing rhetoric and attempts by some members of the Democratic party to curb political contributions from undisclosed sources.

Prominent among the dark money contributors is Defending Democracy Together, a group opposing former President Donald Trump. This organization, along with others such as the Republican Accountability PAC and Republican Voters Against Trump, has been actively organizing and funding campaigns against Trump’s influence in the upcoming presidential race.

The role of dark money in the presidential race is further underscored by the activities of Americans for Prosperity Action, a hybrid PAC led by billionaire Charles Koch, which has reported more contributions from dark money groups than any other political committee at this stage in the 2024 election cycle. This PAC, known for its conservative leanings, has notably endorsed Nikki Haley and has been a significant spender in the election cycle before refocusing its efforts on congressional races following Haley’s withdrawal from the presidential race.

Environmental advocacy groups, such as the League of Conservation Voters, have also emerged as significant dark money contributors, steering substantial funds to affiliated super PACs and shaping the electoral narrative, particularly in key swing states.

As the 2024 elections approach, the influence of dark money, with its inherent lack of transparency and accountability, continues to pose significant challenges to the democratic process. The surge in contributions from undisclosed sources underscores the urgent need for reform and greater transparency in political financing, to ensure that the electorate is fully informed and that the democratic process remains untainted by unseen financial influences.


If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.