Bernie Sanders speaks out: Criticizing Israeli policy is not antisemitism

Amid national debate over Gaza protests, Senator Bernie Sanders challenges the narrative equating criticism of Israel with antisemitism, drawing on his personal history and widespread American discontent.


Amid escalating tensions surrounding the Israeli government’s actions in Gaza and the global protests they have sparked, U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders has taken a firm stand. During a recent CNN interview, Sanders vehemently disagreed with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s claims that U.S. students protesting Israel’s policies are driven by antisemitism. His arguments bring a significant perspective to the debate, not only because of his political stature but also due to his Jewish heritage and family history affected by the Holocaust.

Sanders’ commentary comes at a crucial time when thousands of U.S. students face accusations of antisemitism for their protests against what they see as Israel’s aggressive military actions in Gaza. These students have called for an end to U.S. military aid to Israel and are pushing their universities to divest from Israeli companies. In his interview, Sanders stressed that opposing Netanyahu’s policies, particularly those that have led to significant Palestinian casualties, does not equate to antisemitism. He stated, “Right now, what Netanyahu’s right-wing, extremist and racist government is doing is unprecedented in the modern history of warfare.”

Highlighting the casualties, Sanders noted, “They have killed, in the last six and a half months, 33,000 Palestinians, wounded 77,000, two-thirds of whom are women and children. When you make those charges, that is not antisemitic. That is a reality.” His comments underline a critical distinction between legitimate political critique and racial hatred.

The media’s role in shaping the narrative around these protests has been significant. CNN’s approach to the interview with Sanders included presenting a clip of a student protester making extreme comparisons, which Sanders critiqued as unhelpful but not representative of the broader movement. This media portrayal often amplifies divisions, potentially skewing public perception of the protests’ nature and intent.

Political reactions have varied, with figures like Rep. Ilhan Omar and Rep. Summer Lee supporting Sanders. Omar’s recent remarks in Congress echoed Sanders’ sentiments, advocating for a clear distinction between antisemitism and criticism of specific governmental policies. However, the political landscape remains deeply divided, with some equating all criticism of Israel with antisemitism, thereby conflating ethnic identity with political actions.

Sanders’ statements may influence public opinion, which is already showing signs of fatigue over unconditional support for Netanyahu’s policies. His advocacy for distinguishing between criticism of Israel and antisemitism could encourage a more nuanced discussion about U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding military aid to Israel. This debate is critical as it also relates to U.S. domestic policies on free speech and the right to protest.

The senator’s views are likely to impact future policy debates and legislative actions, especially those related to foreign aid and international human rights law. As the U.S. grapples with its role on the international stage, Sanders’ call for a balanced approach that recognizes the rights and sufferings of all parties could lead to more measured, equity-focused policies.”It is not antisemitic to hold you accountable for your actions,” said Sanders.


If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.