A new survey by the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) highlights a growing political dilemma for Senate Republicans who plan to gut Medicaid to pay for sweeping tax cuts and immigration measures. The proposed legislation could strip healthcare from an estimated 11–16 million Americans in the coming years—yet the public backlash risks turning red-state majorities against GOP senators.
According to the KFF Health Tracking Poll released Friday, “Most of the public is worried about the consequences of significant reductions in federal Medicaid spending, including among many groups that would be directly impacted by the cuts.” The poll showed that approximately 72% of U.S. adults fear that deeper federal Medicaid spending cuts would “lead to more uninsured people and will strain healthcare providers in their communities,” including 46% who are “very worried” and 25% “somewhat worried.”
Republican enrollees are not immune. Over 27% of Medicaid recipients identify as Republican or lean Republican, including 19% aligned with Trump’s MAGA movement. Among these Medicaid-enrolled GOP voters, 75% expressed concern that cuts would harm their families, and nearly 70% believed reductions would increase uninsured rates and burden local providers.
In rural America—where Medicaid is often the lifeline for hospitals—the findings were equally stark. Roughly 70% of rural residents, including 48% of rural Republicans, worry that cuts will leave both individuals and local healthcare institutions vulnerable. Nearly 37% of rural Republicans specifically fear losing access to care altogether.
KFF’s director of opinion research, Liz Hamel, told The Washington Post: “Medicaid is really a popular program, and a large majority of Americans do not want to see decreases in spending.” That popularity stands in direct contrast to the political calculus Republicans face as they weigh support for a party-backed healthcare rollback.
The legislation passed by the House includes staggering cuts—nearly $800 billion over a decade—by imposing work requirements for adults without children, instituting provider tax freezes, and reducing spending on Affordable Care Act (ACA) marketplace plans. The Congressional Budget Office projects that around 7.8 million people would directly lose coverage under such cuts.
Tony Carrk, executive director of progressive watchdog group Accountable.US, warned GOP members: “A vote for the current bill is a vote to take away their constituents’ healthcare—full stop.” He continued, “If they throw their support behind this bill, not only will they have lied to the American people, they will be ripping healthcare from those who need it the most, while the richest Americans—including many of them—could financially benefit.”
This warning comes as individual lawmakers face public backlash. Senator Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) stirred controversy when, in response to a warning that cuts could cause deaths, she responded, “we all are going to die.” The advocacy group Social Security Works later posted, “Iowans are PISSED about sacrificing their Medicaid for a billionaire tax handout,” after Ernst declined to address the matter.
Progressives, led by Senator Bernie Sanders, have sounded the alarm. Citing a study attributing more than 50,000 impending deaths annually to the proposed Medicaid cuts, Sanders said: “In the wealthiest country in the world, we should be guaranteeing health care to all as a human right, not taking health care away from millions of seniors and working families to pay for tax breaks for billionaires.” He pledged to galvanize opposition through his role on the Senate HELP Committee.
Despite Republican endorsements, the poll signals shifting political terrain. Even among Republicans not on Medicaid, nearly 30% expressed concern. As Medicaid supporters extend beyond traditional Democratic coalitions—into rural and working-class GOP districts—the threat to red-state senators grows. With polling indicating 4 in 10 Republicans worry about program cuts affecting their communities, MAGA-era rhetoric may not align with voter anxieties.
Medicaid is no longer just a safety net; it has become a politically decisive wedge. The legislation’s potential to diminish healthcare access for millions of Americans may carry electoral consequences for Republicans—especially those representing lower-income states that would bear the brunt of rollback effects.
COMMENTS