More than 400,000 immigrant children are facing the U.S. deportation system with no lawyer at their side. Some of them are too young to understand what a courtroom is, let alone defend themselves in one.
An analysis of federal immigration records by the Vera Institute of Justice and Drop Site News found that of the 751,861 children with pending removal cases, 57 percent, or roughly 425,000 kids, have no attorney. Advocates say the count includes children as young as one, three, and four years old who are expected to appear before an immigration judge on their own.
Unlike in criminal court, there is no constitutional guarantee of a government-provided lawyer in immigration proceedings, even for children. As the American Civil Liberties Union notes, a federal appeals court has ruled that immigrant children have no right to an attorney unless they can pay for one. In practice, that means a toddler can be ordered to make their own legal case against deportation.
The odds without a lawyer
The consequences are measurable. Children who go through immigration court alone win their cases less than 10 percent of the time, while those with an attorney are roughly five times more likely to be allowed to stay, according to legal-aid organizations tracking the outcomes. Asylum and other humanitarian protections hinge on complex filings, strict deadlines, and evidence that a frightened child cannot reasonably be expected to assemble.
A child appearing alone must still file the correct applications, gather supporting documents, and meet the same legal standards that trained government attorneys are paid to contest. Immigration judges are not permitted to act as the child’s lawyer, and the government is represented by an attorney whose job is to argue for removal.
The Acacia Center for Justice has described how the system’s clock itself becomes a weapon. In a November 2024 report titled “Caught in the Clock,” the group and its research partners documented how rushed hearings, rigid timelines, and long waits can push children past the age cutoffs for protections such as Special Immigrant Juvenile Status. Representation rates have fallen from about 64 percent between 2005 and 2017 to 57 percent in recent years, the group reports.
Funding cuts deepened the gap
The shortage of lawyers did not happen by accident. In February 2025, the Trump administration issued a “stop-work” order to legal-service providers that abruptly cut off help for nearly 26,000 unaccompanied children. The order was rescinded three days later, but within weeks the administration terminated the federal grants that had funded that legal help altogether. Legal-aid organizations said the loss of funding forced them to turn away children they would otherwise have represented.
Some courts have begun pushing back on the broader machinery of mass deportation. A federal court in Denver recently joined at least three others in opposing the administration’s practice of detaining immigrants indefinitely without bond hearings, including people with no criminal history.
Calls to guarantee counsel
In Congress, Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), Sen. Mazie Hirono (D-Hawaii) and colleagues have reintroduced legislation that would guarantee legal representation for unaccompanied children in immigration proceedings. Immigrant-rights advocates argue the fix is both moral and practical. A legal system that asks a four-year-old to cross-examine a government attorney is not delivering anything that resembles due process.
For now, hundreds of thousands of children remain caught in that gap. They are expected to know their rights, meet their deadlines, and argue for their futures, often before they are old enough to read.
COMMENTS