Elon Musk’s “X” accuses Media Matters of defamation amidst growing concerns over antisemitic content

This legal action accuses the nonprofit media company of purposefully and maliciously defaming him and X.


Elon Musk’s social media company X, formerly known as Twitter, has launched a lawsuit against Media Matters for America, alleging defamation following a report on antisemitic content on the platform. This legal action, following Musk’s acquisition of the site last year, accuses the nonprofit media company of purposefully and maliciously defaming him and X.

The controversy stems from a Media Matters publication last week that highlighted the presence of antisemitic, white nationalist, and neo-Nazi posts appearing alongside advertisements from major brands. As a result, several advertisers, including industry giants such as Disney, Apple, IBM, and Comcast, have suspended their advertisements on X.

Musk had previously threatened to take legal action against Media Matters, labeling his planned response as a “thermonuclear” lawsuit. X’s lawsuit contends that Media Matters manipulated algorithms to fabricate images supporting their report, alleging that typical users of the platform would not encounter such juxtaposed content.

Media Matters’ President Angelo Carusone disputes these claims, standing firm on the integrity of their reporting. He views X’s lawsuit as an attempt to intimidate critics and dissuade scrutiny of the platform. Carusone argues the frequency of the problematic content observed by their researchers raises questions about X’s moderation policies.

Moreover, conservative leaders, like Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, have applauded Musk’s move against the progressive-leaning news site. Paxton even announced an investigation into Media Matters based on X’s allegations. However, other reports, including one from the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), suggest that X is grappling with the rampant proliferation of hateful content on its platform. The CCDH report found that a significant percentage of flagged hateful posts remained on X, including those promoting Adolf Hitler and denying the Holocaust.

X’s own policies call for user vigilance in reporting posts that attack individuals based on race, ethnicity, national origin, and other protected categories. The platform claims a commitment to removing such content, but the veracity of these claims is now under scrutiny.

Musk himself became a part of the controversy by promoting a post last week that contained antisemitic conspiracy theories, drawing criticism from various quarters, including the White House. This incident has only fueled the debate over the proliferation of extremist content on X and the platform’s approach to moderating such content.

Observers and experts have largely dismissed X’s lawsuit against Media Matters as frivolous, citing the organization’s methodology in compiling the report and the evident presence of far-right content on the platform. Daxton Stewart, a journalism professor, and Jason Kint, a media strategist, among others, have criticized the lawsuit, highlighting the broader implications for free speech and the accountability of social media platforms.

As the lawsuit progresses, it serves as a crucial litmus test for the boundaries of free speech, the responsibilities of social media companies in content moderation, and the role of the media in exposing and combating online hate.


If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.