GOP attorneys general petition against EPA’s use of civil rights law for environmental justice

The petition, if successful, could have dire consequences for communities living near industrial sites.


A coalition of Republican state attorneys general, led by Florida’s Ashley Moody, is challenging the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) authority to enforce environmental justice through civil rights legislation. On Tuesday, these leaders from 23 states formally requested that the EPA amend Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, a move critics argue could significantly weaken protections against pollution in communities of color.

The group’s petition targets provisions that prevent federally funded entities from causing disparate impacts based on race or national origin. By seeking these changes, the attorneys general aim to enable petrochemical companies and other corporations to operate without stringent checks on how their actions disproportionately affect low-income, predominantly minority communities.

Title VI has been pivotal in numerous legal actions, including recent EPA investigations into Louisiana’s Cancer Alley. This region, known for its high concentration of petrochemical plants, has seen disturbing health disparities, particularly in its predominantly Black population.

The push to amend Title VI aligns with a broader Republican critique of the Biden administration’s environmental policies, which they claim overstep federal authority and hinder business operations. This action follows a ruling by U.S. District Court Judge James Cain Jr., a Trump appointee, who labeled the Title VI requirements as “government overreach.” Furthermore, this petition comes on the heels of the EPA’s decision last year to halt its Title VI investigation into the Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality after a lawsuit from Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry.

Andre Segura, vice president of litigation at Earthjustice, expressed significant concern about the intentions behind the petition: “Republican attorneys general aim to eviscerate civil rights protections just to make it easier for industrial polluters to continue with business as usual.” Segura’s statement reflects a widespread alarm among environmental and legal advocates about the potential rollback of critical environmental protections.

Manuel Fernandez, president of the Miami-Dade County Democrats, described the effort as “embarrassing” and called for Moody’s resignation, highlighting the political tensions surrounding the petition.

The petition, if successful, could have dire consequences for communities living near industrial sites. Data from environmental health studies indicate that regions like Cancer Alley bear a disproportionate burden of pollution-related health issues such as cancer and respiratory illnesses. Critics argue that weakening Title VI could exacerbate these health disparities, leaving vulnerable populations with diminished resources to challenge discriminatory environmental practices.

The controversy also underscores a fundamental debate over the scope of environmental justice and the federal government’s role in addressing it. Proponents of strong Title VI enforcement view the legislation as essential for protecting marginalized communities from environmental harms that have historically been overlooked or ignored by state and local authorities.

Conversely, opponents, including the petitioning state attorneys general, argue that the EPA’s current application of Title VI stifles economic growth and infringes on state sovereignty. This clash highlights the ongoing conflict between economic development interests and the health and safety of residents in affected communities.

The petition by the 23 Republican attorneys general now sits with the EPA, awaiting a response that could potentially reshape Title VI’s application in environmental regulation. The outcome of this petition will directly influence ongoing and future cases concerning environmental justice, particularly those involving minority and low-income communities disproportionately affected by industrial pollution. As this legal challenge unfolds, the involved states and the federal government will play pivotal roles in defining the boundaries of environmental and civil rights law.

“Everyone should be alarmed by these outrageous efforts,” stated Andre Segura of Earthjustice. “The fact is, many of the states that have signed the petition have historically allowed these harmful facilities to be placed in predominantly Black and brown communities, without regard for the health and safety of residents.”


If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.