Migrants tricked by DeSantis scheme gain legal ground with U visas

The granting of U visas marks a crucial step in recognizing the migrants as victims of a potential crime, thus allowing them to legally work in the United States and providing temporary protection from deportation.


The contentious scheme led by Governor Ron DeSantis to transport migrants from Texas to Martha’s Vineyard under deceptive pretenses has turned a new leaf as several migrants qualify for U visas, highlighting a significant turnaround from exploitation to legal protection. This development follows a tumultuous period for the victims who were initially promised jobs, housing, and food but found themselves abandoned and misled upon their arrival.

In 2022, approximately 50 migrants, primarily from Venezuela, were flown from San Antonio, Texas, to the upscale enclave of Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts. The operation, funded by $615,000 of state resources authorized by the Florida legislature, was later revealed to be more of a political statement by DeSantis amidst his re-election campaign and ahead of a presidential run, rather than a genuine effort to aid the migrants.

The recruits were promised substantial support upon their arrival; however, they were met with none. Local volunteer groups had to step in to provide emergency assistance when the migrants were left essentially stranded, showcasing the community’s humanitarian response to a manufactured crisis.

The plight of these individuals took a pivotal turn as some began to qualify for U visas—a type of non-immigrant visa in the United States specifically for victims of crimes who have suffered mental or physical abuse and are helpful to law enforcement or other government officials in the investigation or prosecution of criminal activity. The eligibility for these visas was substantiated by a criminal case initiated by Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar, who alleged “unlawful restraint” in the orchestration of the flights.

The granting of U visas marks a crucial step in recognizing the migrants as victims of a potential crime, thus allowing them to legally work in the United States and providing temporary protection from deportation. The resolution also sheds light on the broader implications of using human lives as pawns in political maneuvers, bringing into question the ethical boundaries of immigration policy and political advocacy.

For the migrants involved, the U visa not only offers a chance to rebuild their lives with legal protections but also an opportunity to participate in the U.S. justice system. Some of these individuals have initiated lawsuits against DeSantis and his administration, alleging that their civil rights were violated through what they describe as a “premeditated, fraudulent and illegal scheme.”

These legal challenges continue to unfold, with a federal judge in Boston recently ruling that the lawsuit meets the legal standards to proceed, though Governor DeSantis was initially removed from the lawsuit. The focus of litigation has shifted to Vertol, the airline contracted for the operation, but the door remains open for DeSantis to be re-included as more evidence comes to light.

This incident illustrates the ongoing challenges and controversies surrounding U.S. immigration policies, particularly the treatment of asylum seekers and the use of immigration issues for political leverage. The exploitation of migrants in this scheme highlights a critical need for policy reforms that prioritize human dignity and legal clarity over political gains.

As the legal proceedings against Governor DeSantis’s controversial migrant flight program continue, the status of the affected migrants evolves. With some now qualifying for U visas, these individuals are granted the opportunity to reside and work legally in the United States.

Reflecting on this shift, Rachel Self, an attorney representing the migrants, stated, “These immigrants, who experienced cruelty akin to what they fled in their home countries, are now able to legally work in the United States and have temporary protections from deportation — because they are considered victims of a potential crime.”


If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.