Quick summary
• A federal judge ordered the CDC, FDA, and HHS to restore public health webpages and datasets that were removed under Trump’s executive order targeting gender-related medical information.
• Trump’s executive order declared that the U.S. government recognizes only two sexes, male and female and directed agencies to remove any materials promoting “gender ideology.”
• Removed materials included HIV testing guidelines for transgender individuals, LGBTQ+ youth healthcare resources, and the CDC’s Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System dataset.
• Doctors for America and Public Citizen sued, arguing that the removals endangered public health by restricting access to vital medical guidance and research.
• Judge John D. Bates ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, stating that removing these resources directly harms underprivileged Americans seeking healthcare.
• Public health experts warned that censoring medical guidance increases disease outbreak risks and disrupts healthcare for marginalized communities.
• The ruling is part of a broader legal pushback against Trump’s rollback of diversity, equity, and inclusion policies, but future legal and political battles over public health transparency are expected.
A federal judge has ruled against the Trump administration’s attempt to restrict public access to key medical resources, ordering the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to restore webpages and datasets that had been removed in compliance with an executive order attacking gender-related health information.
The lawsuit, brought by the advocacy group Doctors for America (DFA) and represented by Public Citizen, argued that these removals jeopardized public health by stripping doctors, researchers, and patients of critical information on HIV prevention, LGBTQ+ youth healthcare, and public health surveillance data.
On Tuesday, U.S. District Judge John D. Bates ruled that the agencies must restore all removed materials by midnight.
“The judge’s order today is an important victory for doctors, patients, and the public health of the whole country,” said Zach Shelley, a Public Citizen Litigation Group attorney and lead counsel on the case. “This order puts a stop, at least temporarily, to the irrational removal of vital health information from public access.”
The webpage removals stemmed from a sweeping executive order signed by President Donald Trump, which declared:
“It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female.”
The order was followed by a memo from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), which directed federal agencies to remove any outward-facing media that ‘inculcate or promote gender ideology.’
In response, federal agencies—including the CDC, FDA, and HHS—began scrubbing their websites of medical guidance, datasets, and research related to gender and LGBTQ+ health.
Among the materials that disappeared were:
• Guidelines for HIV testing for transgender individuals.
• Resources supporting LGBTQ+ youth health.
• The Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS) dataset, which monitors adolescent health behaviors.
• PrEP for the Prevention of HIV Infection in the U.S.: 2021 Guideline Summary.
Some webpages were not removed but rewritten to comply with Trump’s order, altering language and medical recommendations to align with the administration’s political agenda.
Doctors for America, a group representing 27,000 physicians and medical trainees, filed a lawsuit against the OPM, CDC, FDA, and HHS, arguing that:
“DFA and the physicians and medical trainees that constitute its membership rely on webpages and datasets that have been removed in response to OPM’s memorandum, including several pages that related to current evidence and guidelines for providing clinical care, guidance documents on FDA’s website… and numerous publicly available datasets that inform targeted public health interventions.”
The legal team at Public Citizen took on the case, asserting that the removal of these resources constituted a direct threat to public health, especially for vulnerable and underserved populations.
Judge Bates, in his ruling, emphasized:
“It bears emphasizing who ultimately bears the harm of defendants’ actions: everyday Americans, and most acutely, underprivileged Americans, seeking healthcare.”
Citing testimony from two doctors who filed declarations in the case, Bates warned of life-threatening consequences due to these removals:
“If those doctors cannot provide these individuals the care they need (and deserve) within the scheduled and often limited time frame, there is a chance that some individuals will not receive treatment, including for severe, life-threatening conditions.”
1. Disrupting Medical Care
The removal of CDC and FDA webpages meant that doctors lost access to crucial guidelines on treating STIs, immunization schedules, and LGBTQ+ health needs. Physicians reported delays in diagnosis and treatment due to the missing information.
2. Jeopardizing Public Health Research
Public health researchers rely on datasets like the YRBSS to track disease outbreaks and high-risk behaviors. Its removal disrupted essential epidemiological work that informs policy decisions on adolescent health.
3. Increased Risk of Disease Outbreaks
Public Citizen’s lawyer, Zach Shelley, cautioned:
“There is immense harm to the public. There is increased risk of disease outbreak if these webpages are not restored.”
4. Attacking LGBTQ+ Healthcare
The Trump administration’s policy disproportionately impacted transgender and LGBTQ+ youth by restricting access to evidence-based medical recommendations. The removal of HIV prevention guidelines undermined efforts to reduce transmission rates among at-risk populations.
Trump’s executive order was part of a larger strategy to roll back diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives across federal agencies.
1. Targeting Gender and Racial Equity Policies
• Trump signed multiple executive orders to erase DEI language and programs from government institutions.
• Agencies were forced to remove internal policies, training materials, and external communications referencing gender identity.
2. Ongoing Legal Challenges Against Trump’s Orders
• Courts have recently blocked Trump’s attempt to curtail birthright citizenship, marking another setback for his administration.
• Civil rights groups are preparing further lawsuits against policies that target LGBTQ+ rights, reproductive healthcare, and workplace protections.
3. Public and Political Response
• Senator Ed Markey (D-Mass.) took to X (formerly Twitter) to celebrate recent legal victories against Trump’s orders, posting “BLOCKED” in response to multiple court rulings.
• Medical and civil rights organizations condemned the administration’s efforts to censor science-based healthcare information.
• Will Trump attempt to override the court ruling?
• The Biden-era restoration of LGBTQ+ health protections was already reversed by Trump’s administration.
• Future orders could attempt to restrict public access to sensitive health data through other means.
• Legal and legislative action moving forward:
• Public Citizen and DFA will monitor federal agencies for compliance.
• Congressional Democrats may push for legislation protecting LGBTQ+ healthcare access and medical transparency.
• Republican-led states could implement similar restrictions at the state level.
The court’s ruling marks a significant victory for doctors, patients, and public health advocates, but the fight is far from over. Trump’s executive order demonstrates the extent to which his administration is willing to interfere in medical science to advance an ideological agenda.
The removal of public health resources not only disrupted medical care but endangered millions of Americans who rely on evidence-based guidance.
Defend the rights of all people nationwide, follow ACLU.
COMMENTS