New study finds climate change denial received disproportionate media coverage for decades

"Rather than marginalize self-interested voices and give prominence to expert voices, these papers did just the opposite."

127
SOURCEEcoWatch

Mainstream news outlets gave disproportionate coverage to climate denial and opponents of climate action for nearly thirty years, a new study found.

The research, published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, used plagiarism detection software to detect coverage of 1,768 press releases from 1985-2013 across nearly 35,000 articles in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and USA Today.

“The way climate change has been covered in the media could help us understand why there’s so much public disengagement on this issue,” Rachel Wetts, the study’s author and an assistant professor at Brown University’s sociology department, told the Independent.

Even though just 10% of all press releases contained messaging against climate action, they were twice as likely to garner coverage.

Edward Mailbach, director of the George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communications, called the study’s conclusions unsettling.

“Rather than marginalize self-interested voices and give prominence to expert voices, these papers did just the opposite,” he told Grist.

Get NationofChange in your inbox

Independent reporting every weekday. No paywall, no advertisers, no corporate owner. Free, and you can unsubscribe whenever you like.

Subscribe free

Your gift is being matched, up to $2,000.

A member of the NationofChange board is matching every contribution to our summer drive, dollar for dollar, until the $2,000 is used up or the drive ends on August 31. We take no advertising money and answer to no corporate owner. The article you just read was paid for by readers, and right now what they give counts twice.

FALL FUNDRAISER

If you liked this article, please donate $5 to keep NationofChange online through November.

[give_form id="735829"]

COMMENTS