Quick summary:
• Trump plans to end birthright citizenship through an executive order despite 14th Amendment protections.
• Legal experts and progressives argue this move is unconstitutional and undermines American values.
• Birthright citizenship, guaranteed since 1868, ensures equal treatment and prevents statelessness.
• Critics warn the policy would create a class of second-tier citizens and enable mass deportations.
• Trump proposes deporting U.S.-born children of undocumented immigrants, sparking outrage.
• Economic and social consequences include deepening labor shortages and eroding community trust.
• Progressive lawmakers and immigrant advocates vow to resist this attack on constitutional rights.
Donald Trump’s recent declaration that he plans to end birthright citizenship in the United States has sparked intense criticism from progressives, legal experts, and immigrant rights advocates. During a 76-minute interview with NBC News’ Kristen Welker, Trump stated that he “absolutely” intends to pursue this policy, potentially through an executive order, despite the clear protections guaranteed under the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. His comments have been widely condemned as unconstitutional and a direct assault on American values.
Birthright citizenship, enshrined in the 14th Amendment since 1868, guarantees that anyone born on U.S. soil is automatically a citizen, regardless of their parents’ immigration status. This principle was established to ensure the rights of formerly enslaved individuals and has been a cornerstone of American democracy. Trump’s statement challenges more than 150 years of legal precedent, raising alarm among progressives and immigrant communities alike.
During the interview, Trump falsely claimed that the United States is the only country to offer birthright citizenship. In reality, dozens of nations, including Canada and Mexico, provide citizenship by birth. Legal scholars and constitutional experts have pointed out that Trump’s plan to end this right via executive order is not only unprecedented but also fundamentally unconstitutional. Amending the Constitution requires support from two-thirds of Congress and ratification by three-fourths of state legislatures—a politically improbable scenario.
Progressives were quick to respond. Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), outgoing chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus, declared on social media, “This is completely un-American. The 14th Amendment guarantees birthright citizenship. Trump cannot unilaterally end it, and any attempt to do so would be both unconstitutional and immoral.”
Trump also proposed deporting U.S.-born children of undocumented immigrants alongside their parents to avoid family separation. This plan would effectively strip millions of children of their citizenship and force them into exile. Critics argue that this approach not only undermines constitutional protections but also tears at the social fabric of the nation.
Rep. Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.), the daughter of Guatemalan immigrants, emphasized the human cost of Trump’s proposal. “The story of our nation wouldn’t be complete without the sweat, tears, joy, dreams, and hopes of so many children of immigrants who are citizens by birthright and pride themselves on being AMERICANS,” she said in a statement. Ramirez further noted that the policy raises questions about “who gets to be an American” and described it as a thinly veiled attempt to exclude immigrants from Africa, Asia, the Caribbean, and Latin America.
The 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause has long served as a safeguard against discrimination and statelessness. It reflects the core American values of equality and inclusion. Legal experts argue that ending birthright citizenship would create a dangerous precedent, dividing citizens into classes and undermining the principle of equal treatment under the law.
Hiroshi Motomura, a UCLA law professor specializing in immigration and citizenship, described the policy as a “prelude to mass deportation” and a direct challenge to equal protection. “It’s really 100 years of accepted interpretation,” Motomura told Mother Jones. He emphasized that such a move would erode the legal and moral foundation of American democracy.
Trump’s comments come amid his plans for mass deportations, which he previewed during his NBC interview. His previous administration faced global condemnation for family separations and harsh detention policies at the southern border. Critics warn that his return to office could usher in even more extreme measures targeting immigrant communities.
Vanessa Cárdenas, executive director of America’s Voice, highlighted the far-reaching implications of Trump’s immigration agenda. “Trump and allies are making clear their mass deportation agenda will include deporting U.S. citizens, including children, while aiming to gut a century and a half of legal and moral precedent on birthright citizenship,” she said in a statement.
In addition to legal and moral concerns, ending birthright citizenship would have significant economic and social ramifications. Stripping millions of their citizenship could exacerbate labor shortages in industries like agriculture and construction, which rely heavily on immigrant workers. The policy would also deepen social divisions and marginalize immigrant communities, eroding trust in public institutions.
Progressives and immigrant rights advocates are mobilizing to resist Trump’s proposals. Lawmakers like Rep. Adriano Espaillat (D-N.Y.), the first formerly undocumented immigrant elected to Congress, have vowed to fight any attempts to undermine birthright citizenship. “Birthright citizenship is not just a legal right—it is a testament to our shared values and the promise of America,” Espaillat said during a CNN appearance.
As Rep. Ramirez stated, “To live into [the] promise [of freedom, opportunities, and equality], we must stand against white nationalism—especially when it is espoused at the highest levels of government.”
“Trump cannot unilaterally end birthright citizenship,” Jayapal concluded. “The Constitution is clear. We will fight this unconstitutional and immoral attack on our values.”
To learn more about birthright citizenship, visit the American Immigration Council.
COMMENTS